The Carolina Panthers are Idiots

[davos]

Not a small channel, they dive into everything we all know, for a much greater audience to see.  

Oh lawdy.

Edited November 7, 2022 by davos

[SmokinwithWilly]

Water is wet.

[Ornias]

Moore's contract is fine. Burns should have been shipped. Burns is not elite. 

[Mr. Scot]

His basic premise is they should have immediately gone into "fire sale" mode.

Yeah, not impressed.

[TheCasillas]

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

His basic premise is they should have immediately gone into "fire sale" mode.

Yeah, not impressed.

I dont understand the concept of "Trade 2 first round talents who are established in the league for 3 first round picks." 

Trading DJ would kill our cap situation and give us 20million in total dead cap. Trading Burns creates a huge hole on the roster. 

[Panthercougar68]

22 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

His basic premise is they should have immediately gone into "fire sale" mode.

Yeah, not impressed.

Honestly half the nfl is mad because they didn’t acquire the players they wanted from the panthers.

The number or DJ and Burns jersey swaps people made showed that these players are wanted/good players.

[Kuhndog94]

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I dont understand the concept of "Trade 2 first round talents who are established in the league for 3 first round picks." 

Trading DJ would kill our cap situation and give us 20million in total dead cap. Trading Burns creates a huge hole on the roster. 

Trading Burns would've maybe been okay depending on where the 1st round draft picks fell. We could've possibly drafted Will Anderson Jr or the kid coming out of Clemson to replace him. And still had a draft pick left to spend on a QB.

[Panthercougar68]

1 minute ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Trading Burns would've maybe been okay depending on where the 1st round draft picks fell. We could've possibly drafted Will Anderson Jr or the kid coming out of Clemson to replace him. And still had a draft pick left to spend on a QB.

Problem is the Rams 1st are years out and packers first pick will probably be 15-17

[frankw]

[Kuhndog94]

1 minute ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Problem is the Rams 1st are years out and packers first pick will probably be 15-17

Both of the Rams 1sts? I didn't know that. I haven't seen the specifics. I had assumed one was this year and the other 1st was next year.

[Panthercougar68]

1 minute ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Both of the Rams 1sts? I didn't know that. I haven't seen the specifics. I had assumed one was this year and the other 1st was next year.

Yep 2024 and 2025. It would be one thing if it were 2023 for one of them I feel.

[PghPanther]

[Panthercougar68]

So who do the Colts sell off in the offseason? Leonard? Pittman? Quentin Nelson? 
 

oh they don’t need to because they just need a new qb and coach

Firesales are what bigger market teams want smaller market teams to do to benefit their own team not the team doing the “selling”

[Waldo]

Burns absolutely should have been traded for 2 1st and a 2nd. If you don't have the crew to pick up at least 2 very good players with those 3 picks then keeping Burns isn't going to matter either way. 

He isn't wrong but I think Moore for just a 1st is too little vs his value and decent contract. Jackson is the DJ I wish we could ship off for a 2nd and 4th/5th. Plenty of solid CB talent coming out and he isn't worth his contract.