Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Now that Young/Stroud will be gone before the Panthers pick, what FA QB do u want


 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I don't think he has anyone decent left on his schedule does he? So if they are all scrubs it's going to make him look better.

South Carolina is 6-3

Vandy is 3-6

Florida State is 6-3, ranked in the top 25 and all three of their losses came from ranked opponents. Two of which were by one score. 
 

So no… we aren’t playing some cupcake schedule for the last few weeks to make him look good. On top of that we lost one of our top pass catchers this week due to injury and the flashy guy who caught a nice one handed TD also got hurt. 
 

We already lacked pass catching talent and now we have less. If Richardson performs well it’s because he’s performing well. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Varking said:

South Carolina is 6-3

Vandy is 3-6

Florida State is 6-3, ranked in the top 25 and all three of their losses came from ranked opponents. Two of which were by one score. 
 

So no… we aren’t playing some cupcake schedule for the last few weeks to make him look good. On top of that we lost one of our top pass catchers this week due to injury and the flashy guy who caught a nice one handed TD also got hurt. 
 

We already lacked pass catching talent and now we have less. If Richardson performs well it’s because he’s performing well. 

Lol all three of those teams Suck.

South Carolina? The mighty Vandy?

I watched Richardson after you guys talked him up. Specifically went to bars just to watch him. His misses aren't close. His misses are by a mile. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I prefer to look at QBs who have played this past I don't know half a century???  What players did in the 60s doesn't reflect today's NFL.  Different rules, different types of athletes.  We are talking about a Josh Allen style QB and you bring up some guy from the 1960s as the QB you want....

The 60s? He played until 79. He invented the Hail Mary. 

You want a guy that can run well he's the Bible for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

The 60s? He played until 79. He invented the Hail Mary. 

You want a guy that can run well he's the Bible for it.

He started in 69, played college in the early 60s. Looks like he finished with 57% completions… Michael Vick was 56.2 and is considered inaccurate by you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully support an all in approach:

R1 if high up: Young or Stroud

R1 if we're not ~pick 5-12: Trade up 

R1 if Young or Stroud can't happen: gamble on the highest remaining ceiling (Richardson or Levis?)

...and you don't stop there

R3-4: Draft another QB 

R5-7: Draft another QB

I dunno, just roll into 2023 with Bryce Young, Grayson McCall, Jake Haener, & Corral.    

Try everything.  Do the RGIII-Cousins strategy and then some.  

Still land some DL and WR peppered between.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

@ForJimmy you are pooing the idea of getting Roger Staubach reincarnated?

You like a dual threat QB well using your definition he's the greatest Dual Threat there is. 

But I guess Rings and Gold Jackets are disqualifiers for you.

I like Staubach, but the best dual threat in NFL history is Steve Young.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Lol all three of those teams Suck.

South Carolina? The mighty Vandy?

I watched Richardson after you guys talked him up. Specifically went to bars just to watch him. His misses aren't close. His misses are by a mile. 

Those teams don't suck. They all have NFL talent. Are they among the very best this year? No. But acting like they're a bunch of div3 nothing's when it comes to evaluating a player is pretty crazy.  They will provide useful tape on him for scouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

He has a thing against QBs that can run.  He doesn't like change....

The same as lots of people overrate qbs based on their ability to run.  There are plenty from both camps.

Edited by Tr3ach
Better worded
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Chris Smitty said:

Waiting for Maye. 

 

If we draft in the top 5 pick Will Anderson. If we pick around 10 draft the TE kid from Notre Dame. 

I'd like to see if Will Anderson can play MLB in the NFL. He'd be an absolute monster with his size, jets, quickness, instincts at that position. I see him as a Micah Parsons type possibly not playing at his true NFL position. I think he has the potential to be very special.

He's just a BPA. A smart coach will just take him and put him wherever he needs to be.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Lol all three of those teams Suck.

South Carolina? The mighty Vandy?

I watched Richardson after you guys talked him up. Specifically went to bars just to watch him. His misses aren't close. His misses are by a mile. 

Who exactly has Drake Maye beat that has you so impressed with him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Here’s what’s going to happen.

We will have our third straight 5 win season.

We’ll get the 3rd or 4th best QB in the draft. Neither that QB nor Corral will beat out PJ.

PJ will start again next year. 

Another 5 win season.

With a new coach?

I'm not sure I buy that scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sometimes you get very valuable information from fantasy football sites. I found an analysis that you may want to read from The Fantasy Footballers. Perhaps you'll gain an insight as to why we moved up and got him. As always, here are a few snippets: "As expected, he dominated in the 2023 season. He averaged an impressive 2.03 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play, which ranks in the 86th percentile among all junior seasons since 2013." "Naturally, after initially playing behind two NFL-caliber running backs, Brooks’ career numbers do not jump off the page. However, his 2023 campaign gave us a glimpse of just how massive his upside could be at the next level. In fact, Brooks is one of only TWO running backs in this class to exceed 2.00 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play within their first three seasons in college."  "If you watch Jonathon Brooks’ film, you will find multiple plays in which he created yardage with his quick feet and lateral agility. He is elusive in open spaces and has an impressive ability to stack multiple cuts to avoid contact. Combined with his impressive burst and acceleration, Brooks can be a matchup nightmare in the second and third levels of the defense." "While Brooks is not the most physical running back, he does have a knack for absorbing contact and bouncing off defenders. You see this time and time again in his film." "He showcased a willingness to initiate contact with the pass rusher, the strength to maintain blocks, and the quickness to adjust to the defender’s moves. In addition, per PFF, Brooks was a top-three running back in the 2024 class in pass-blocking grade last season. He was also one of only two running backs in the class to average a 0% pass block pressure rate, highlighting just how effective he was as a blocker." "In short, Brooks has tremendous upside as a prospect. Even with his ACL injury, I would still be comfortable drafting him in the early second round of rookie drafts. In fact, I would not be shocked if he finished his career as the most productive running back in this class. However, we just need to temper our expectations for his rookie year as he slowly ramps up to full health." Marvin Elequin provides more here (including video clips): https://www.thefantasyfootballers.com/dynasty/2024-rookie-profile-rb-jonathon-brooks-fantasy-football/   Basically, Brooks has the potential to be a beast, and was well worth the 46th pick (and most mocks had him going mid second round anyway). He's not JAG. Someone had to make the move and take him, and we were the ones to do it. He's elusive, has good speed and acceleration, exceptional contact balance, and is an outstanding blocker. Just like any nice RB transitioning to the league, he will need to get used to taking what the defense gives him, while also showing discriminating patience, but he has demonstrated some ability on that front in college. Brooks' only real knock is the ACL. But ACLs aren't career ending anymore, or even skill ending as evidenced by Dalvin Cook, Todd Gurley and others. We'll just need to temper our expectations during his rookie campaign while he gets back to form. Once he does, we'll finally have the talented three-down back that has eluded us since Stew retired.
    • 2.43 : Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon 2.52 : Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas 3.65 : Junior Colson, LB, Michigan 3.79 : Blake Corum, RB, Michigan 4.101 : Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas 😎 5.141 : Sedrick Van Pran-Granger, C, Georgia 5.142 : Austin Booker, Edge, Kansas 5.155 : Christian Jones, OT, Texas Note, I traded down from 33 (took the Arizona/Atlanta trade up to 35 - might have actually been able to net an even better deal but whatever, I'll go with this). Took the Rams trade but stayed put at 52 and at the top of the 3rd.
    • I mean, first of all, I'm not the one who initially said he was a life long fan, it was in that tweet in the OP. But more importantly, "life long fan" is a relative term, especially for a franchise like the Panthers.  I think anyone who was say, 10-12 or younger when the franchise started, and been a fan since the start, could claim to be a life long fan. I'm 38, been a fan of the team since year 1 even though I'm not even from the Carolinas, after almost 30 years of fandom and following them since the beginning, I have no issue saying I'm a life long Panthers fan. Very possible his dad is say around 40 years old and been a Panthers fan since the start.  And even if he's a little older, if you're a fan of a team for 30 out of your say 45ish years of life... that's "life long" in that instance.
×
×
  • Create New...