Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Young and Stroud are gone


Chris Smitty
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Pakmeng said:

Which QB would you take?

who cares, at this point you have to give everything you’ve put together a chance to succeed or you will watch it all wither away 

i hope people have had enough punishment by now to know that that “can’t miss” piece they overhype at LB or WR or DE isn’t going to take this team to the next level

games aren’t won in the trenches 

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BPA. Given OPs scenario, I think Breese, Johnson or Mayer would be the answer. Come back for Richardson either late 1st or if he’s there with your R2 pick, he should be the sit and stash QB for the new regime. 

DJ/TMJ/Laviska/Mayer/Tremble would be a helluva unit for Richardson behind our OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Chris Smitty said:

Imagine we pick #6 in the next draft, Young and Stroud are gone before us. Will Anderson, Myles Murphy and Jalen Carter too.

Who do you want ? 

- We need a QB should try Levis, Hooker or Leivs too high ? 

- BPA after this 5 guys but who is it now ? Skoronski ? 

- Find a number #1 target for our next QB coming in 2024 ? Addison, Smith-Njigba, Johnston ? 

- The best Tight End in this class the kid from ND Michael Mayer ? 

- Another CB in the top 10 just for laugh ? 

I'd say Smith-Njigba - I think he is going to be a damn good receiver in the NFL, as long as he stays healthy. I honestly don't think any of the other QBs should go in the 1st round and not in love with much else if Anderson, Murphy, and Carter are gone.

That scenario would honestly be the worst case scenario and I would look to trade down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...