Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next week's starter


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jets have beaten 5 of their last 6 opponents with Wilson at QB.   Including wins against the Bills and Phins. 

seems a bit odd the Jets HC is calling out the young QB.   Bill Belichick got him.  Happens to lots of guys. Jets RBs averaged 1 yard a carry on Sunday. 

I didn’t like him coming out.  Don’t think he is good.  But why not just let him play the year and let all the questions get answered on him.  Joe Flacco isn’t leading you any where this season.  Bench him and you still have Zach Wilson questions IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CRA said:

Jets have beaten 5 of their last 6 opponents with Wilson at QB.   Including wins against the Bills and Phins. 

seems a bit odd the Jets HC is calling out the young QB.   Bill Belichick got him.  Happens to lots of guys. Jets RBs averaged 1 yard a carry on Sunday. 

I didn’t like him coming out.  Don’t think he is good.  But why not just let him play the year and let all the questions get answered on him.  Joe Flacco isn’t leading you any where this season.  Bench him and you still have Zach Wilson questions IMO. 

Mike White season. At least the players like him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CRA said:

Jets have beaten 5 of their last 6 opponents with Wilson at QB.   Including wins against the Bills and Phins. 

seems a bit odd the Jets HC is calling out the young QB.   Bill Belichick got him.  Happens to lots of guys. Jets RBs averaged 1 yard a carry on Sunday. 

I didn’t like him coming out.  Don’t think he is good.  But why not just let him play the year and let all the questions get answered on him.  Joe Flacco isn’t leading you any where this season.  Bench him and you still have Zach Wilson questions IMO. 

Maybe they are thinking that they could trade him for more if he doesn't play because it would show the sucker's what he's actually worth? It worked before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Captroop said:

I don't think it will matter. We're going to see the same consistently bad level of QB play for the remainder of the season (unless Darnold balls out behind this re-vamped line.

I've seen enough of Mayfield now to know he's not only not the future here, I think he's done in the league. His throws look like Broncos era Manning. He never recovered from the shoulder injury, and I doubt he will. I'll admit, I was hoping for him to be successful here. I was hoping for him to be the future here. But he's not the same QB he was, and he's not starter quality, sad to say.

I'll continue to watch, however, because the Defense is genuinely exciting to see. Between that and the run game, we're looking like a team that's ready to make a jump to the next level. Any coaching prospect should look at this team and be excited for the possibilities. But we need a QB, and a WR corps beyond DJ.

Yeah i watched him throw a 10 yard out yesterday with like everything he could put on it not get there then watched him almost Jimmy Clausen a throw away that almost didn't make it out of bounds 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like see Sam Darnold get the chance to start Sunday to see if he has learned anything from his long absence.

In the past Darnold has shown small flashes of the talent that got him drafted highly. Hopefully he will be able to showcase that talent on a more consistent basis. 

Plus, it is doubtful if he could do any worse than Baker or Harris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...