Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule joins GMFB Tuesday & Wednesday


Ocpanthertew714
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I was actually going to post the interview he had with some dude but then i figured, why the fug would I waste my time? lol

I wasted 30 min watching. It’s what you would expect. Blames covid since he’s more of a rah rah guy instead of X’s and O’s it was hard for him the first year and some of the second. Doubling down that what he does works. Thinks what he does would’ve worked eventually but understands he had to win quicker. Mentioned our record in the NFCS. Said he’ll learn from this experience in whatever level he’s coaching in he’ll use it to be better. Mentioned high school coaching a lot so I have no idea if that means he’s not getting a lot of calls.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, hepcat said:

I honestly hate Tepper more than anyone for hiring this clown and giving him such a ridiculous contract

For sure man. I’m not even mad at Tep anymore I’ve essentially checked out this season but if peeps are gonna hate any one it should be Tep imo. Oh well though every one has a right to feel how they feel! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

I wasted 30 min watching. It’s what you would expect. Blames covid since he’s more of a rah rah guy instead of X’s and O’s it was hard for him the first year and some of the second. Doubling down that what he does works. Thinks what he does would’ve worked eventually but understands he had to win quicker. Mentioned our record in the NFCS. Said he’ll learn from this experience in whatever level he’s coaching in he’ll use it to be better. Mentioned high school coaching a lot so I have no idea if that means he’s not getting a lot of calls.

He’s in a financial position where he can be picky on what offers he takes. I won’t be surprised if he would be interested in high school football if it was the right situation. At 47 years old he isn't short on time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, CashNewton22 said:

Man I just don’t have any animosity towards him like that. He was an awful…awful coach and I’m glad we’re rid of him but I hope he does well in life and peace out. I get why peeps hate him still but I’m just not gonna let that man have any more of my emotions I have compete apathy towards him now. He’s just another dude. 

Pretty much.

Have said repeatedly that I have no hate for somebody just because they're awful at their job. And like others, I blame Tepper more for being dumb enough to hire him.

I'll watch out of sheer morbid curiosity.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

I wasted 30 min watching. It’s what you would expect. Blames covid since he’s more of a rah rah guy instead of X’s and O’s it was hard for him the first year and some of the second. Doubling down that what he does works. Thinks what he does would’ve worked eventually but understands he had to win quicker. Mentioned our record in the NFCS. Said he’ll learn from this experience in whatever level he’s coaching in he’ll use it to be better. Mentioned high school coaching a lot so I have no idea if that means he’s not getting a lot of calls.

All right, this is weird...

Those quotes bear a lot of similarity to what was said in the Charles Robinson article.

It wouldn't exactly be shocking to find out he read an article about himself, but to turn around and quote or paraphrase things that were in it would be kind of 🤔

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

All right, this is weird...

Those quotes bear a lot of similarity to what was said in the Charles Robinson article.

It wouldn't exactly be shocking to find out he read an article about himself, but to turn around and quote or paraphrase things that were in it would be kind of 🤔

The irony of this is that given the fact we basically tore the place down to the studs in year 1, that was his best year.  I had hopes when that team actually posted 5 wins and was competitive.  It was the second half of year 2 and the start of this year that he looked absolutely clueless.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...