Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft position updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

There’s some irregularly bad football being played this year. 
 

Cant tell if it’s bad offense or Good defense… but it’s an interesting year where even good coaches are struggling. Maybe it’s just peril. 
 

But tanking for a QB is officially over. Steve Wilks needs to be retained. He’s got these Guys playing winning football. 

  • Pie 5
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheWiz said:

There’s some irregularly bad football being played this year. 
 

Cant tell if it’s bad offense or Good defense… but it’s an interesting year where even good coaches are struggling. Maybe it’s just peril. 
 

But tanking for a QB is officially over. Steve Wilks needs to be retained. He’s got these Guys playing winning football. 

It's the fall off of great quarterbacks without replacements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

It's the fall off of great quarterbacks without replacements.

I Definitely think this in part. The other shoe is how impatient the league is with developing its QBs , and how poorly they evaluate college QBs. Any game manager could’ve run out offense today. Sam didn’t need to be special. He just needed to not cost us the game 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheWiz said:

There’s some irregularly bad football being played this year. 
 

Cant tell if it’s bad offense or Good defense… but it’s an interesting year where even good coaches are struggling. Maybe it’s just peril. 
 

But tanking for a QB is officially over. Steve Wilks needs to be retained. He’s got these Guys playing winning football. 

I think we are in a weird spot where the rules implemented over the last decade that so heavily favor the offense are starting to create a very bad situation for teams that don’t have one of the top 5 QBs. There used to be the ability to have a winning season and deep playoff run with middle of the road QB and dominant D, but now you literally can’t sneeze on a QB without a penalty. 

Just my opinion, but I think this is what’s causing 75% of the league to look like poo this year.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...