Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Person looks at Mayfield, Rhule and "revisionist history"


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It will be fun to see how much more behind the curtain we get to see as a result of Rhule frantically trying to change the narratives about his tenure here. So much would have just stayed behind the scenes and now it is going to be public because he crossed so many people.

I don't know whether Person already knew all this stuff (sounds like he might have) or if any of it was "mysteriously leaked" to him.

And yeah, more of that wouldn't surprise me.

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, stbugs said:

That’s why I take everything after someone leaves with a grain of salt. Heck, it happens in every business. The person who left gets thrown under the bus to make the current folks look good. We saw all the wow the Panthers are all of a sudden tough now, which lasted a couple days before Cincy took us to the woodshed.

Not saying Rhule didn’t suck, just that the current staff has the local reporters ears and those reporters will likely say whatever they are told and no chance it will it be bad news about the current staff.

I just ignore these snippets because I’ve seen it even in my line of work where the people that left get blamed for things they did and things some people want other people to believe they did. Some truth, some under the bus throwing and we’ll likely never really know because we weren’t there.

Difference here is they weren't saying anything at all, and still might not be. Person may have already known all this.

Rhule could have kept quiet too, but he chose to shoot his mouth off.

So if there are any further revelations, it'll be his own fault.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

May have, that’s my point. I know you despise Rhule but he’s gone, time to stop dwelling. I’m sure you’ve worked at jobs where people left, especially not on great terms. Stories and throwing people under the bus was common, especially by folks who wanted to look better and the folks who wanted to look better can disseminate their story. The people who left don’t have the same mouth pieces (local reporters here). There are truths because there’s reasons why they left and there are blame games to get the bad moves on someone else’s resume.

If Person knew before, why not make it a story early on when Mayfield is floundering. I remember more than a few people in here giving kudos to Fitterer for Mayfield and making more decisions this year, including you. Now that Mayfield is a bust, he’s hooked to Rhule who’s already gone and to be honest, unless we have a recording of it, we’ll never know the truth, which is probably something lame like a joint decision.

Now you're revising history.

So apparently the real reason for your skepticism is it contradicts your narrative.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Phil Snow's...

correct.

https://www.nfl.com/news/matt-rhule-on-why-panthers-didn-t-pick-qb-in-draft-i-just-believe-in-sam-darnold

 

"We were sitting there one day on defense, and I can't remember (exactly) what we were watching, we were watching a cut up, and Sam was playing on the other side of the ball, and a couple times he made some throws, and Phil Snow, our defensive coordinator, was like, 'Man, that kid looks like Matt Stafford.' And so, we put a couple games on – and this is the defensive staff -- and they were all like, 'You know what, every game we watch, he makes a couple of big-time plays, and there has to be some meat on the bone there,' "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Sounds like a bunch of excuses. 
    • Damn Ghost had a hell of a series then huh?
    • The much shorter and less number analytical version of the above is that the T-Mac pick wasn't about giving Bryce an alpha receiver this season that dominates the targets. It was about shifting the rest of the WRs down a peg in their role to give Bryce better options this year while giving us a true #1 to take over next year when Thielen retires or signs somewhere else. It's to let XL and Coker grow this year as the 3rd and 4th option instead of the 2nd and 3rd option, so that they are then ready to step into those increased roles in 2026.  While at the same time it's to allow T-Mac to get used to the NFL game without the pressure on him that those rookies last year had to be THE guy.   And that's not to say he can't be THE guy, it's just that if you don't HAVE to do that to your rookie, it's better for the entire team, no matter how good that rookie may or may not be.  Expectations are different than real possibilities. It's very POSSIBLE for T-Mac to get to 1k this year, but I think it's unfair to put that EXPECTATION on him leading into the season due to the other options Bryce will have at his disposal this year.
×
×
  • Create New...