Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are we a ten win team with wilks from day one?


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

Couple of close games gotta think we atleast beat the browns. The talent here is playoff talent even if wilks were to hold them up. Rhule is just that bad. If we get in and match up with dallas and minnesota i think we can make championship. Tough teams up front are the achilles heel and we cant adjust to that.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilks is coaching at a .500 clip.  Sam was injured to start the season remember all, so he'd be stuck with Baker as well.  I don't think this is a 10-5 team right now with him; maybe a 9-6 though I think 8-7 is the most likely.

Edited by mav1234
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

Idk about 10 wins. 8 would definitely be within reach. 

We're within reach of 8 wins right now and thats with a 1-4 start by the worst coach in franchise history.  He'd be tied with Perry Fewell if I considered his internship as a real coach.  Wilks would have this team between 9-11 wins if here from day one of the season.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

Wilks is coaching at a .500 clip.  Same was injured to start the season remember, all, so he'd be stuck with Baker as well.  I don't think this is a 10-5 team right now with him; maybe a 9-6 though I think 8-7 is the most likely.


Fwiw, if Eddie P. didnt poo his jockeys, we'd be 2 over .500 with him, in definitive first place, and only a game under .500.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

To be at 10 wins we would have had to go 5-0 to start since Wilks is 5-5. No chance we’d have been 5-0. Yes, Cleveland game was close but honestly that had more to do with bad Cleveland coaching. They ran all over us but kept forcing it with Brissett and killed a bunch of their drives. They should have done the same as we did to Detroit and it wouldn’t have been close.

Yup. I think we go 3-3 in the first 6 games of the season even with Wilks and Baker, so the 2 game swap to win column would put us at 8-7 now.  But 10-5?  I don't see it personally. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
    • Jones got projected as the next Eli because they share a similar goofball, on the spectrum energy.  That's my theory.
    • I didn't think underrated was the wildest statement. The passing and offensive command he showed in week 18 against Atlanta was as good as any QB that has ever played for this franchise.  I mean THAT part is wild.  Which plays into the overrated part.  End of regulation I don't think he even hit 200 yards passing.  I mean he had a very efficient day vs a weak defense.   As good as we have ever seen in Carolina?   
×
×
  • Create New...