Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers working out Josh Norman today


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, DJ feed me moore said:

/cdn-cgi/mirage/2c732b875a9c937cb45b8f16c1ada27d3c0c9096f3c0e023cb2e326cb3cf3c3c/1280/https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6008715/sadnorman.0.gif

it never sat right with me that this was his final image in a panther uniform. I know we aren't going to be sniffing the SB at all but it will be nice to see Norman back in the fold. Empty the tank josh, I know there's some fumes in there.

Gettleman fuged that situation up six ways to Sunday. Literally couldn't have played that hand worse if he tried.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Gettleman fuged that situation up six ways to Sunday. Literally couldn't have played that hand worse if he tried.

he was a fool and I cant believe anyone here has actually attempted to defend him at any point past the day he cut Steve Smith. The Norman franchise tag saga completely soured me on him and then Ron benching cam for not wearing a tie was when I soured on RR. 2016 fuging sucked.

Edited by DJ feed me moore
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, T-Wazzle said:

Meh, what else can they do?  He's played under Wilkes before.   Whatever. 

 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/2022/all/cornerback/available/

 

theres a few names, simialr to norman as in nfl old- sherm, haden, harris, rhodes, and even the dawg himself cockrell. corn is still out there......alford is another..former 1st round pick and only 24 year old baker is on the list too..

I count about 10 names, lots more than i thought....but how many are in shape/able to run with beast WRs??? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, DJ feed me moore said:

/cdn-cgi/mirage/d5a4e95a101afd06afe02f923c273447fdc3a0c0e7c8d1899ed508c6d013d801/1280/https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6008715/sadnorman.0.gif

it never sat right with me that this was his final image in a panther uniform. I know we aren't going to be sniffing the SB at all but it will be nice to see Norman back in the fold. Empty the tank josh, I know there's some fumes in there.

Between that and the Smitty debacle and getting Cam fuging destroyed, prematurely ending his career, or at least his prime, that's why for me, it will always be fug Dave Gettleman.  Dude shut our Superbowl window as soon as it fuging opened, mostly because of his overinflated, gym teacher ego.  fuging asshole.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...