Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Harbaugh to Carolina Makes Too Much Sense...


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

I don’t see Harbaugh or Wilks being here longer than 4-5 years. 

Harbaugh will win, get bored, pick fights and move on. 
 

Wilks will just get so conservative that he is punting on 3rd down. And I think he will play pets and favorites worse than Rivera. 

He’s been at Michigan for 8 years without any problems.  Maybe just maybe it was the 49ers owners and gm being *****.   I mean what more did they want him to do?

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, remember that .700 winning percentage that Harbaugh had? Doesn't sound like a bunch of disgruntled players laying down, now does it?

Go back and read about the way he left and was fired. There was a lot of disgruntled folks. The only reason they tolerated him was he won. The minute they struggled he was gone.  If he was so great why haven't folks been trying to get him and why did the Vikings interview him last year and not hire him. Again your logic is simplistic and somewhat uninformed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He’s been at Michigan for 8 years without any problems.  Maybe just maybe it was the 49ers owners and gm being *****.   I mean what more did they want him to do?

In college football he controlled everything with no oversight. No one to complain to and players are easily intimidated. In the nfl you have more people to answer to and pro players won't put up with the same thing.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ericr0319 said:

you're incorrect, especially if you want to reference college. and it was 7-0. 

Apparently you weren't watching the game. The 4th down that was even worth discussing was when we were up 14-0 before half. But I get it as dudes like you know very little about football and are basically just fanatics as evidenced by referring to men who know have forgot more about the game than you've ever witnessed "pussies." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NorthTryon said:

Apparently you weren't watching the game. The 4th down that was even worth discussing was when we were up 14-0 before half. But I get it as dudes like you know very little about football and are basically just fanatics as evidenced by referring to men who know have forgot more about the game than you've ever witnessed "pussies." 

 it was 7-0 when we had 4 and 1 at our own 42. again, it was 4 and 1 again from our 42, again, when it was then 14-0. 

your age comment shows you know very little about football in 2022. if you want to keep Wilks, fine, but enjoy mediocrity. also, "evidenced by referring to men who know have forgot more about the game" is not english. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2023 at 11:17 AM, Mr. Scot said:

It's been reported previously the Tepper has gained a reputation around the league of being a lousy boss to work for. That's probably something that's going to factor into our coaching search.

Young guys looking for their first opportunity might not be too worried about it, but duys with options might.

Based on what exactly?

Almost seems like a narrative that has been overplayed.

Think about it, so far he has shown a willingness to overpay a coach.  That is a pretty big selling point to most coaches.

He has shown a willingness to be overly patient with coaches according to most fans, for example both Ron and Rhule.  As a future coach that would be a good thing.

Also from most reports he pretty much lets his football people make the draft decisions.  He isn't one of these owners trying to play GM.

So he pays well, gives you plenty of time, and stays out of your way during the draft, those are the qualities that probably really make a difference to potential coaches.

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2023 at 11:17 AM, Mr. Scot said:

It's been reported previously the Tepper has gained a reputation around the league of being a lousy boss to work for. That's probably something that's going to factor into our coaching search.

Young guys looking for their first opportunity might not be too worried about it, but duys with options might.

Not saying you are talking out your rear, where are you hearing this from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Go back and read about the way he left and was fired. There was a lot of disgruntled folks. The only reason they tolerated him was he won. The minute they struggled he was gone.  If he was so great why haven't folks been trying to get him and why did the Vikings interview him last year and not hire him. Again your logic is simplistic and somewhat uninformed. 

Power hungry owners and GM's make dumb decisions on coaching fires all the time. They went 7-25 during the next two coaching hires.  And if Harbaugh is such an ass, why don't Michigan players transfer out now that they are allowed to leave for any reason? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Go back and read about the way he left and was fired. There was a lot of disgruntled folks. The only reason they tolerated him was he won. The minute they struggled he was gone.  If he was so great why haven't folks been trying to get him and why did the Vikings interview him last year and not hire him. Again your logic is simplistic and somewhat uninformed. 

In regard to the Vikings, they decide to go with the latest offensive guru from the Sean McVay tree. Some teams love to go for young offensively minded head coaches now rather retreads or defensive side of the ball coaches. Plus there’s probably a very good chance Harbaugh wanted more control than they were willing to give, whereas a first time head coach would not. 

I suspect teams have shied away from him due to the cost and the likelihood he’d want significant control in the front office. Also, as you rightly say, his tenure in San Francisco didn’t end well. So perhaps teams have been hesitant to bring him back to the NFL. Whatever the reason, if he returns it will certainly be interesting to see how it plays out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

When you make this grand statements its probably best to have receipts 

It's not exactly hard to look stuff up

And hey, it works well as opposed to just making dumbsh-t statements which require no intelligence whatsoever.

"Fug Fitt", for example 🙂

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...