Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Harbaugh to Carolina Makes Too Much Sense...


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

I don’t see Harbaugh or Wilks being here longer than 4-5 years. 

Harbaugh will win, get bored, pick fights and move on. 
 

Wilks will just get so conservative that he is punting on 3rd down. And I think he will play pets and favorites worse than Rivera. 

He’s been at Michigan for 8 years without any problems.  Maybe just maybe it was the 49ers owners and gm being *****.   I mean what more did they want him to do?

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, remember that .700 winning percentage that Harbaugh had? Doesn't sound like a bunch of disgruntled players laying down, now does it?

Go back and read about the way he left and was fired. There was a lot of disgruntled folks. The only reason they tolerated him was he won. The minute they struggled he was gone.  If he was so great why haven't folks been trying to get him and why did the Vikings interview him last year and not hire him. Again your logic is simplistic and somewhat uninformed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He’s been at Michigan for 8 years without any problems.  Maybe just maybe it was the 49ers owners and gm being *****.   I mean what more did they want him to do?

In college football he controlled everything with no oversight. No one to complain to and players are easily intimidated. In the nfl you have more people to answer to and pro players won't put up with the same thing.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ericr0319 said:

you're incorrect, especially if you want to reference college. and it was 7-0. 

Apparently you weren't watching the game. The 4th down that was even worth discussing was when we were up 14-0 before half. But I get it as dudes like you know very little about football and are basically just fanatics as evidenced by referring to men who know have forgot more about the game than you've ever witnessed "pussies." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NorthTryon said:

Apparently you weren't watching the game. The 4th down that was even worth discussing was when we were up 14-0 before half. But I get it as dudes like you know very little about football and are basically just fanatics as evidenced by referring to men who know have forgot more about the game than you've ever witnessed "pussies." 

 it was 7-0 when we had 4 and 1 at our own 42. again, it was 4 and 1 again from our 42, again, when it was then 14-0. 

your age comment shows you know very little about football in 2022. if you want to keep Wilks, fine, but enjoy mediocrity. also, "evidenced by referring to men who know have forgot more about the game" is not english. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2023 at 11:17 AM, Mr. Scot said:

It's been reported previously the Tepper has gained a reputation around the league of being a lousy boss to work for. That's probably something that's going to factor into our coaching search.

Young guys looking for their first opportunity might not be too worried about it, but duys with options might.

Based on what exactly?

Almost seems like a narrative that has been overplayed.

Think about it, so far he has shown a willingness to overpay a coach.  That is a pretty big selling point to most coaches.

He has shown a willingness to be overly patient with coaches according to most fans, for example both Ron and Rhule.  As a future coach that would be a good thing.

Also from most reports he pretty much lets his football people make the draft decisions.  He isn't one of these owners trying to play GM.

So he pays well, gives you plenty of time, and stays out of your way during the draft, those are the qualities that probably really make a difference to potential coaches.

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2023 at 11:17 AM, Mr. Scot said:

It's been reported previously the Tepper has gained a reputation around the league of being a lousy boss to work for. That's probably something that's going to factor into our coaching search.

Young guys looking for their first opportunity might not be too worried about it, but duys with options might.

Not saying you are talking out your rear, where are you hearing this from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Go back and read about the way he left and was fired. There was a lot of disgruntled folks. The only reason they tolerated him was he won. The minute they struggled he was gone.  If he was so great why haven't folks been trying to get him and why did the Vikings interview him last year and not hire him. Again your logic is simplistic and somewhat uninformed. 

Power hungry owners and GM's make dumb decisions on coaching fires all the time. They went 7-25 during the next two coaching hires.  And if Harbaugh is such an ass, why don't Michigan players transfer out now that they are allowed to leave for any reason? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Go back and read about the way he left and was fired. There was a lot of disgruntled folks. The only reason they tolerated him was he won. The minute they struggled he was gone.  If he was so great why haven't folks been trying to get him and why did the Vikings interview him last year and not hire him. Again your logic is simplistic and somewhat uninformed. 

In regard to the Vikings, they decide to go with the latest offensive guru from the Sean McVay tree. Some teams love to go for young offensively minded head coaches now rather retreads or defensive side of the ball coaches. Plus there’s probably a very good chance Harbaugh wanted more control than they were willing to give, whereas a first time head coach would not. 

I suspect teams have shied away from him due to the cost and the likelihood he’d want significant control in the front office. Also, as you rightly say, his tenure in San Francisco didn’t end well. So perhaps teams have been hesitant to bring him back to the NFL. Whatever the reason, if he returns it will certainly be interesting to see how it plays out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

When you make this grand statements its probably best to have receipts 

It's not exactly hard to look stuff up

And hey, it works well as opposed to just making dumbsh-t statements which require no intelligence whatsoever.

"Fug Fitt", for example 🙂

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...