Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Saints let's get this over with GameDay thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, ncstatekwi said:

STAND AND CHEER FOR THE PANTHERS....STAND AND CHEER FOR YOUR TEAM....CAUSE NOTHING COULD BE FINER THAN TO BE IN CAROLINA FOR A PANTHERS FOOTBALL GAME!!!

From the mountains to the ocean

Carolina Carolina best of them all

From the endzone to the endzone Carolina Carolina carry the ball

Oh nothing could be finer than to be in Carolina for a Panthers football game

Oh nothing could be finer than to be in Carolina for a Carolina Panthers Football Gameeeee.

CAROLINA!!!!!!

 

Rrrrrrrawrawrrawral!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

It's too bad we didn't, but you can't force the players to give up. Darnold, as much as he sucked, basically willed this team down the field on the final drive. As terrible as that may have been for our draft position, I don't really care that much anymore either way - I think we'll get a good player and we'll be in for a bit of development. Maybe we trade up, but I kinda doubt it. I don't think that changes if we were 7, 8, or 9 either.

Shooting up from 7 to say 4 with Arizona was doable. It’s not about getting any good player. They want a QB. So it was all about limiting the cost.

Guess we’ll see how it plays out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

Shooting up from 7 to say 4 with Arizona was doable. It’s not about getting any good player. They want a QB. So it was all about limiting the cost.

Guess we’ll see how it plays out

It's Chicago or bust. It's going to be very expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

Yup.  Tbh, I'm happy with both of these things, which is why I'm not stressing one draft pick position. 

Yeah, way too much being made of it.    I generally ignore the tank crowd anyway.  

To be honest, I am not sure I would want either of the top two qb's in this years draft.  Young is small.  He looks great when he is playing on an offense surrounded by five star recruits, but when the talent is more evenly distributed, he might not last long.  Stroud is interesting, but still a 1 in 3 at best chance he becomes a successful NFL qb.  But if we move up and get one, then I will hope for the best.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...