9th pick set in stone

[mav1234]

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

I hope so, Richardson will be better than two of them

his potential is sky high, but his draft would make the HC choice even more important.

[45catfan]

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

There is no way to know this early. Jimmy G and Derek Carr will land somewhere. Geno Smith will be available if the Seahawks don’t resign him and if they do they might wait a year on drafting one. There is a lot of offseason left between now and April.

If you have a potential franchise QB in the draft (top 5 pick), you don't go out and sign a journeymen QBs before the draft.

[raleigh-panther]

1 hour ago, *FreeFua* said:

Number 1.

It would cost a fortune to trade up to 1.

Better off asking about Fields rather than the 1st overall pick

You know the Bears are very high on Fields right?

ive watched the  bears games   He isnt t the issue 

 

[RJK]

as a panther fan since day 1 I have to say the offseason has been the most exciting thing about this franchise for a while. Now I get to dig into the draft and the coaching search instead of watching 40 yards passing through 9/10 of a meaningless game

[Bear Hands]

This draft kind of blows all around so just take a stab at whatever QB is at the top of your board and available at 9

 

[sonburst4]

No way we should trade up.  Draft BPA at #9, resign Darnold to compete with Corral, and improve the DL, Secondary and WR group with the rest.

[ForJimmy]

6 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I do think the top 3 QBs will be gone by 9.

Will OUR top 3 options be gone by 9 and if two of the 3 are gone we may look at moving up to 6/7 for much less capital.

[Jon Snow]

1 minute ago, Bear Hands said:

This draft kind of blows all around so just take a stab at whatever QB is at the top of your board and available at 9

 

I think that has been the plan all along.  I'm more interested in who will be choosing said QB.

[glenwo2]

1 minute ago, sonburst4 said:

No way we should trade up.  Draft BPA at #9, resign Darnold to compete with Corral, and improve the DL, Secondary and WR group with the rest.

"compete", my ass.

If it was up to me, I'd be getting Corral ready to start Next season with Sam backing him up....and with AR as our Draft pick QB as the 3rd string.

[ForJimmy]

6 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

If you have a potential franchise QB in the draft (top 5 pick), you don't go out and sign a journeymen QBs before the draft.

Not every team will view this class’s QBs as high as others. Some teams will love Levis, some will love AR and some may not be high on any of the top options. That’s why so many mocks are wrong every year. 

[ForJimmy]

4 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

This draft kind of blows all around so just take a stab at whatever QB is at the top of your board and available at 9

 

I kind of want AR at 9 if he is there.

[Htarnation4.0]

8 minutes ago, sonburst4 said:

No way we should trade up.  Draft BPA at #9, resign Darnold to compete with Corral, and improve the DL, Secondary and WR group with the rest.

Absolutely

[Navy_football]

Reaching for a QB in the draft is the absolute worst thing this team could do. If our guy isn't available with #9, then get the DE, LB, WR or TE that will start for the next 5+ seasons. That's a win in my book. Take a chance with a 2nd or 3rd if you want, but be sure with the 1st and the HC. Everything else will work out.

[mrcompletely11]

Just now, Htarnation4.0 said:

Absolutely

Loving the darnold family aliases.