Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don’t think the Saints have as much leverage as everyone thinks they do. Payton’s not gonna allow his future team to be gutted before he steps foot at the podium. He can just kick back and work Fox for another year until his contract is up and then the Saints get nothing for him. 
 

He’s going to get to pick where he goes and will have a say in that compensation. I actually believe him when he says he and loomis have discussed compensation. My guess is the team that gets him gives up a second this year and a future first (and that’s as steep as it gets). The value of those two together probably come pretty close to a pick in the 20’s in this years draft. 

Edited by bigdog10
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Didn't Cam have his highest completion % in 2018 after we fired Dorsey and got the Turners? We gotta stop re-hiring guys that we fired on these Carolina pro sports teams

I don't want Dorsey, but that has less to do with any work that either coach did with Cam and more to do with the scheme differences.  Shula ran a very archaic passing scheme.  Relied too much on vertical routes and we often didn't give Cam many options underneath.  On top of that, he didn't often have the guys who could consistently separate.  Led to a low CMP%.  Norv Turner wasn't great but his passing game was more modern and gave Newton more options to get the ball out fast.
 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Payton interviewed with Broncos Tuesday morning in LA (i.e. afternoon East Coast time), not Monday morning 

My mistake, still isn’t it odd it’s coming out now. I remember during the Watson stuff ppl were reporting meetings went well right after it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CarolinaRideorDie said:

There's been reports that Loomis now wants AT LEAST 2 1st rounders! I'm for hiring Payton but hell no to that asking price! 

Saints do have a lot to lose if they are asking too much, Payton would just sit out next season and then be free of his contract and NO wouldn't get any compensation. 

 

And Carolina wanted two first rounders for McCaffrey. Just cause they want doesn't mean they will get it. Their options are Carolina and Denver right now, and Denver certainly doesn't have that to give.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...