Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

For real. @rippadonn, name one receiver on that roster not named Kenny Golladay (who only had like 6 catches all year and was their highest paid player).

 

The guy that got hurt in the beginning, the vet...forgot his name.

A good/great QB can cover up for the fact that your best receiver is Philly Brown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea who the Panthers will hire as the new HC but hope it will be an offensive minded one. Here is an interesting article pertaining to the success of offensive vs defensive HC hiring's.

It’s no secret the league has trended to offensive head coaches over the last few years as teams search for the next Sean McVay (Rams) or Kyle Shanahan (49ers). Since 2019, there have been 30 head coaching openings in the NFL. 20 of those openings were filled by offensive coaches, nine by defensive coaches, and one by a special teams coach.

When looking at the combined record of these coaches, offensive coaches have had much more success. The 20 head coaches have a combined record of 341-339-4 (.502) in the regular season, with two Super Bowl appearances (Bruce Arians and Zac Taylor) and one Super Bowl victory (Arians). However, only eight of those 20 coaches have a winning record.

Records of NFL head coaches hired from 2019-2022 who came with an offensive background.

When it comes to the defensive coaches hired in that span, they have fared far worse. The nine head coaches have a combined record of 116-166-2 (.412) in the regular season with no playoff wins. Only one of those head coaches has a winning record, current Los Angeles Chargers head coach Brandon Staley.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panther4life said:

I watched several Giants games this year as my wife is a fan. Daniel Jones play this year is light years ahead of the potential anyone on our roster has. He’s played his ass off and often running for his life but the kid makes plays!

I've been watching Daniel too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The longstanding rumor was that he'd join the Steelers staff as their new OC, but the team decided against firing Matt Canada.

I could see him as a QB coach under Wilks, though I could also see Ben McAdoo being retained in that capacity.

Wouldn't really want either as an OC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stuart Smith said:

Sean Payton is currently the hot name in coaching circles, however while many think he will coach again I am not sure he will.  I have to think there is a better than 50% chance he stays with Fox. He may be angling for more money from them at contract time. 

SP suuucked as commentator. I Bet Fox is hoping he goes back to coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

Any possibility of Roman being a HC prospect? Any chance Tepper brings him in?

Doubt it.

Sounds like the "mutual" departure of Greg Roman was about keeping Lamar Jackson.

 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...