Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2023 Offensive PFF Grades


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Mother Grabber said:

to have Elflein and Bozeman separated by only 2.2 points shows how useless these stats are

Agreed. It was pretty obvious to the eye test that Bozeman was the far superior player. I'd challenge PFF to support their grade for Elflein relative to Bozeman with specific evidence and if they can't, ignore it as garbage.  This sort of thing simply destroys their credibility to anyone who's actually paid attention to this team this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Seltzer said:

Of all the unexpected things that happened this year, Chuba establishing himself as a legit RB2 was one I didn't see coming.  Obviously, the much-improved offensive line played a part, but Chuba broke a lot of tackles this season he didn't in past seasons.  I am guilty of a lot of Chuba slander, but he really did establish he can play in this league and was more than Mrs. Rhule's favorite.

All 3 primary RBs (after the CMC trade) played well.  I could still see us taking a RB in one of the later rounds, but it is nowhere as big of a need as I thought it would be once we traded CMC.

And anything over a 60 PFF grade is not bad, considering 50 is average.

The biggest takeaway from the offensive side (outside of QB), is the clear need to upgrade at TE, especially in terms of pass catching.  Both Ian Thomas and Tommy Tremble are pretty good at run blocking, and they will both be on the team next year, but neither offer much at all in the passing game.  And Stephen Sullivan is never going to be that guy IMO

This 100 percent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

He's also better than Sam at being irrelevant, though Sam is fast approaching that as well, depending on what happens next.

Will you still remain a fan once Darnold gets the boot, and goes to another team?

Wouldn’t bother me if both are irrelevant to this team. I want both gone from next years squad. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Seltzer said:

Of all the unexpected things that happened this year, Chuba establishing himself as a legit RB2 was one I didn't see coming.  Obviously, the much-improved offensive line played a part, but Chuba broke a lot of tackles this season he didn't in past seasons.  I am guilty of a lot of Chuba slander, but he really did establish he can play in this league and was more than Mrs. Rhule's favorite.

All 3 primary RBs (after the CMC trade) played well.  I could still see us taking a RB in one of the later rounds, but it is nowhere as big of a need as I thought it would be once we traded CMC.

And anything over a 60 PFF grade is not bad, considering 50 is average.

The biggest takeaway from the offensive side (outside of QB), is the clear need to upgrade at TE, especially in terms of pass catching.  Both Ian Thomas and Tommy Tremble are pretty good at run blocking, and they will both be on the team next year, but neither offer much at all in the passing game.  And Stephen Sullivan is never going to be that guy IMO

Chuba has always broken tackles. He's got underrated power to be his size. I've consistently said that he's our most explosive back. The area he needs to improve is his hands. He may have made some nominal improvement, I don't know, but he'd be an awesome option in a RBBC situation if he could consistently catch. Now, I'd say he's just a good option. Although I'd like to upgrade the position, I think that we had better think twice before letting Chuba walk.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AggieLean said:

Will you still remain a fan once Darnold gets the boot, and goes to another team?

Wouldn’t bother me if both are irrelevant to this team. I want both gone from next years squad. 

Of course.

I want Corral to get a shot here.

Not sure about whom the Panthers select at QB in the draft but hopefully we land a good QB (if we trade to move up). 

 

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It feels like Deja vu all over again.

@AggieLeanYou're reading from kungfoodude's script I see and must be mistaking me for a Darnold fanboy that I used to be when I first arrived here last year. 

Was already asked that question by those who arrogantly thought I was gone from here.

No sh*t I'll still be a fan, sherlock.

What a stupid f*cking question.  Staring Ice Cube GIF

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, glenwo2 said:

It feels like Deja vu all over again.

@AggieLeanYou're reading from kungfoodude's script I see and must be mistaking me for a Darnold fanboy that I used to be when I first arrived here last year. 

Was already asked that question by those who arrogantly thought I was gone from here.

No sh*t I'll still be a fan, sherlock.

What a stupid f*cking question.  /cdn-cgi/mirage/fca5f8343d5e151eec9f086213a99e9631041342c38fd104d3f1df356d4f8a92/1280/https://media4.giphy.com/media/ReDLLlU9fDqmI/200.gif

 

We shall see. We shall see. It all sounds good what you saying.

Oh, and watch it with the disrespect.
 

 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...