Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lamar could be gone……Article ahead.


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

 

This is for all the guys and girl saying he quit lol. A hilarious, yet awful, take. Lamar has put his body on the line for his team his entire career. Gotta look out for you at some point, because these owners and front offices will cut you when it’s beneficial for them.

Edited by AggieLean
  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

What's crazy is ppl keep wanting washed up rejects of other teams, if he was still a "Elite MVP Caliber qb", Baltimore would be doing everything in there power to keep him 

 

He's not a reject from Baltimore, and they are doing all they can to keep him, but he clearly doesn't want to be there. They could probably offer him the full 5-year guaranteed deal and it shouldn't surprise anyone if he turned it down. That relationship is just broken, and that's neither an indictment on his caliber as a player or Baltimore's caliber as a franchise. Both are still light years better than the pack.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

Jackson is electric but he will get hurt long term at some point in his next contract. We should learn from Cam.  Jackson game isn't able to sustain a 12 year career. Hard pass.

What is there to learn from Cam?

What took Cam out is him trying to make a tackle on an intercepted ball. What finished the job was a hit by TJ Watt, in the pocket. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be very hesitant to give up a haul for Lamar due to the injury concerns but I cannot deny if healthy he would make us instant Super Bowl contenders in this conference. Look at who is winning in the NFC playoffs right now. Daniel Jones? Brock Purdy? I'm getting some vibes from this thread a little reminiscent of the Cam days. LadyPanther even in here pooing posts over Lamar Jackson lol really? Awkward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

What is there to learn from Cam?

What took Cam out is him trying to make a tackle on an intercepted ball. What finished the job was a hit by TJ Watt, in the pocket. 

Cam was great but we saw the refs let defenders tee off head shots. Cams shoulder gets all the blame but the foot was equally as bad.  I'm not I donating Cam was a mistake just the likelihood of a running QB lasting the entire length of his second contract is akin to the CMC contract 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...