Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ Stroud enters the draft


jb2288
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

this is incorrect from what we know - we offered a better trade package BUT Watson refused because of lack of a guaranteed contract... so we were willing to 'trade the farm' for him... 

This argument is incredibly stupid. 

If we were truly willing to trade the farm, regardless of which offer was bigger, then Watson would be here, period.  That's trading the farm.  Not being out bid. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a link from Walter football updated on jan 10  I shared one last month that was better but this at least gives the nss as med of those outside of the top 4

if the 49ers can make a starting qb out if the last draft pick, the new hire of the panthers should be able to do something with a first or second rd pick 

update  this also shows 2023 projected  draft as well  some eeem to be left out like Penix but at least it gets names out there 

Top 10 qbs in 2023

honestly, I like that kid from Houston and the guy from Stanford  

at any rate, the new offense and it’s system will determine what the panthers do, we all know that.  

How good are the Panthers scouts, who knows 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Again.  Goes back to other unteachables so outside of physical measurables.

just like Russ’s weight never effected him.   He has it between the ears.  He feels the pressure better than about any QB to come out in a long time.  He reads defenses better and his pocket awareness.  He knows when to get the ball out or get out of the pocket and go off script.  Which outside of Mahomes, he’s the best I’ve seen.

 

Sure, I get what you're saying. If he's super smart then perhaps the risk of getting hurt will be mitigated, but he's going to get hit (just like Russ has gotten hit plenty). But, remember, Russ really isn't a small guy. He has a certain amount of constitution to him.

Don't get me wrong, if we trade up for either, I won't be crying. I'll just deal with it as it comes. You gotta pay to play in some circumstances. If you want to roll with the big dogs, you have to be willing to come off the porch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

This argument is incredibly stupid. 

If we were truly willing to trade the farm, regardless of which offer was bigger, then Watson would be here, period.  That's trading the farm.  Not being out bid. 

 

Except when a player has a "no trade" clause like Watson does.  He gets to pick where he goes no matter how much we try to trade away to acquire him.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Here is a link from Walter football updated on jan 10  I shared one last month that was better but this at least gives the nss as med of those outside of the top 4

if the 49ers can make a starting qb out if the last draft pick, the new hire of the panthers should be able to do something with a first or second rd pick 

Top 10 qbs in 2023

honestly, I like that kid from Houston 

at any rate, the new offense and it’s system will determine what the panthers do, we all know that.  

How good are the Panthers scouts, who knows 

.

 Clayton Tune (Houston) is projected to be drafted  somewhere in the 4-6 round.

Like you, I feel he could have good value at that rang

Tune is 6-foot-3, 220-pounder, has enough size and will enter the next level with a lot of starting experience because he broke into the starting lineup during the 2019 season

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It's a saying that means betting the future.  You are not ABSOLUTELY correct, you just have a different opinion of what that means.  The Browns still have cap space and some picks so they didn't risk "everything" to acquire Watson as that is completely unrealistic.  Many analysts were saying the Niners "bet the farm" to acquire Lance which was 3 first rounds picks.  Stop arguing about a simple saying a poster used that means they wagered a lot of future assets.  

Would you like me to post what Google says it means? I know what it means. What we were offering for Watson was a lot, but it wasn't some earth shattering contract, plain and simple. It wasn't setting any fianancial precedents. It was simply a big contract. The  Browns gave him an unprecedented financial contract that will hamstring them for many many years to come if they made the wrong deal. 

Three first round picks is a lot for an unproven rookie, particularly one as raw as Lance. It was truly unprecedented. That being said, they made the deal, and they obviously either got lucky, or their scouting department and coaches are smart enough to work around Lance's situation. It appears that "betting the farm" was mitigated by their smart decision-making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Varking said:

If he falls I’d love it. If not I’d like to move up and snag him. He’s my QB1 in this class. 

If he's there then it will depend on our new coach I guess.  It's possible the Panthers will not have a 1st round pick at all. The draft is a few months away. A lot of things can and will happen between now and then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Well, it's like I always say: the Devil is in the details. Watson's contract was  unprecedented. What made it so was the amount of guaranteed money. The repercussions could last at least four more years, but probably more.

I'm not saying that we won't trade up. That's going to depend upon how much they believe in an unproven rookie. But even if we do trade up, we're probably not going to set any precedents in draft compensation for said player. 

Although I agree it was unprecedented at the time there's a lot that goes into that - I think the circumstances moreso than anything, because otherwise it's just a natural progression of salaries. To me, the compensation package to HOU was a huge risk for us given those circumstances as much as the contract.

Also I agree with you on the draft... I think whatever we give up will be similar to other recent trades. As the 49ers are showing you can move up to trade for a player and even if it doesn't work out super well you can still have an excellent team with the right coaching. That's where I want us to be.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Although I agree it was unprecedented at the time there's a lot that goes into that - I think the circumstances moreso than anything, because otherwise it's just a natural progression of salaries. To me, the compensation package to HOU was a huge risk for us given those circumstances as much as the contract.

Also I agree with you on the draft... I think whatever we give up will be similar to other recent trades. As the 49ers are showing you can move up to trade for a player and even if it doesn't work out super well you can still have an excellent team with the right coaching. That's where I want us to be.

I can respect that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...