Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For those who ARE interested in Sean Payton...


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 1/17/2023 at 12:36 AM, Tbe said:

It would be the McCaffrey load of picks correct?

Makes you wonder if this was a reason for the trade.

I thin they made that trade because he was an oft-injured RB on a boatload of money.

Isn't it funny that he's not been injured since he arrived in Santa Clara?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, MVPccaffrey said:

Trading high draft capital for a 60 year old coach who made his bones with a top 10 QB ever and really not anything else after that would be an emblematic error for a star f***er of an owner like Tepper.  Jon Gruden had a better case to make as a big splash retread than Payton does and we all know how that turned out

It was a symbiotic relationship though.

Brees was a good NFL QB before Payton. He was elite after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

I wouldn’t hate him coaching us I just hate the idea of giving up draft capital to get him. 

I understand that, but when was the last time Payton had a full draft to work with, and how have most of Payton’s picked turned out? He is great at making chicken salad out of chicken poo.

Edited by philit99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I've heard this year's 4th + next year's 1st. I'd be content with that, but that's about the max I'd be comfortable with.

Same.

So long as it's not this years 1st.

4th this year, and next years 1...I'm in.

Although I'm not thrilled about Payton, I think outside of Harbaugh it would be the best hire available...now to find a QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not to me. You win six games by 3 points but lose one by 30, you have a negative point differential but still have a winning record. Stats are flukey in football. That's why I don't rely on them for evaluation.  But again, my evaluation of this team is not that they're a great team or even a very good team. What I've seen doesn't bear that out. I see an average to potentially above average team that can beat bad teams and also has been able to hang with some good ones. Mind you, that's an improvement from previous seasons but it's still not where we want to be.  And no, I'm still not convinced we get to where we want to be with Bryce at the helm. But we have some challenging games coming up where he at least has a chance to prove me and other doubters wrong. Bottom Line: I doubt my overall assessment of the team is all that different from yours. We just arrive at our respective takes via differing paths.
    • We also took XL over McConkey. The Panthers always have an almost illogical hard on for project players that fulfill height/weight/speed parameters who may not have been the best players in college.  Although to be fair,  Tmac was consistently productive and that paid off. They didn't over think that pick and they benefited.  McConkey was insanely explosive at Georgia but the Panthers probably never even considered him with a below average height/weight/other measurable. 
    • 4th and 3 inside the 15 and GT is gonna kick a FG? No way. You're down 4 scores. You gotta go for 7. Okay, they called a timeout. Surely they're going for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...