Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers in violation of NFL rules regarding their search for a permanent head coach, multiple sources tell CBS Sports.

SgtJoo

By SgtJoo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WarHeel Mentor

WarHeel

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

These trainings aren’t pointless. I did 20 in the navy and we had 10 or so similar trainings every year across various topics (the same thing every year for 20 years is excessive, but these one time trainings aren’t too much).
 

You never know how some people are raised or the environment they learned from, something that’s common sense to most might not be to someone and you don’t want that someone making decisions that might be lacking in what most would think is obvious, like you can’t exclude someone based on race, gender, etc.  So these trainings are important for establishing a baseline of what’s expected and setting a minimum standard for how things are expected to be done. 
 

What’s stupid is thinking this minor oversight on a brand new requirement is some big deal. It’s a nothing burger, they were informed months ago and subsequently forgot about it among the million other things they have to consider in owning a team among other business responsibilities.  They’ll learn from it and move on. 

Doing 20 in the Navy should have taught you that these trainings don’t really do much for how people treat others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, WarHeel said:

Doing 20 in the Navy should have taught you that these trainings don’t really do much for how people treat others.

Might not change 90 out of 100 people but I guarantee it makes a few people stop and think about how they treat people. And that makes it worth it. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, ladypanther said:

Is there a team ownership that does not have nepotism?

It's wild how within a week sports takes can go from "this guy is a quitter for not blowing out his knee for my entertainment" to "nepotism never hurt anybody". American values 😂

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
MechaZain Veteran

MechaZain

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
11 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Can y’all imagine if Jerry Richardson had to do this training lol

You notice that your colleague Mary is wearing a well fitting pair of denim pants. Which of the following statements are an appropriate response? (Mark all that apply.)

A.) "Show me how you wiggle to get those jeans up."

B.) "I bet you lay down on your bed to fit in those jeans."

C.) "Did you step into those jeans or did you have to jump into them?"

D.) None of the above

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • The D 1
  • Flames 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WarHeel Mentor

WarHeel

Posted
Posted
Just now, AggieLean said:

But she is, so respectfully, this post is moot. I saw you mention skin color in another post. Your post was about Wilks wasn’t it lol. 

I’m an advocate for Wilks earning the HC position regardless of his skin color so not sure what you’re getting at.

 

I am generally not a fan of people being handed or stripped of opportunities simply based on the color of their skin. Character and resume should be the standard. If that makes me racist then call me whatever you like.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggieLean Grand Master

AggieLean

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

I’m an advocate for Wilks earning the HC position regardless of his skin color so not sure what you’re getting at.

 

I am generally not a fan of people being handed or stripped of opportunities simply based on the color of their skin. Character and resume should be the standard. If that makes me racist then call me whatever you like.

Nah, I don’t think that. You’re good.

I just hope the panthers aren’t punished severely for this simple screw up

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BIGH2001 Grand Master

BIGH2001

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

You notice that your colleague Mary is wearing a well fitting pair of denim pants. Which of the following statements are an appropriate response? (Mark all that apply.)

A.) "Show me how you wiggle to get those jeans up."

B.) "I bet you lay down on your bed to fit in those jeans."

C.) "Did you step into those jeans or did you have to jump into them?"

D.) None of the above

At first I read this as, your colleague “Marty”

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, WarHeel said:

So you think she’d secure that position if she wasn’t married to the owner?

She’s co-owner of the team. Of course she is going to be part of this. That happens on every team.

Half the Walton family just met with Russell Wilson to tell him to be a better teammate.

Team owners always have their say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...