Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Playoffs - Week Two


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Camp Fodder said:

Well if someone would have told Rhule he really didn’t have 7 years he would have kept him. 

Wonder if Rhule is pondering tonight how a second year Eagles HC and a Rookie Giants HC have managed to accomplish so much in so little time? 

Rhule:  Less than seven years?  These two coaches are doing the impossible!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Missed most of the live game, but watching highlights it seems like the Eagles knew every passing play the Giants ran. Kafka picked a bad day to get exposed. Obviously more talent on the Eagles side of the ball, but Steichen had Herbert looking better year one than he did this year, and Hurts balling out. That's definitely a more convincing body of work than Kafka who might be benefiting from Daboll in the first place

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RJK said:

Eagles might be the team. Chiefs look beatable. Bills look beatable. The eagles D line vs the Bengals O line is unfair. 

I think SF might be the team that they matchup with worst. SF has a good oline and can run the ball well, something the Eagles have struggled to stop against good rushing teams. SF is also good at stopping the run.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Sure.   After the fact...hindsight whatever....

It was BAD.   lol

I think it was easy for people to forget that Philly was by far the best team in the NFL for the bulk of the season.

2 of their 3 total losses were with the backup QB. They would be a 2 loss team without Hurts getting injured.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

NFL is so scripted.

 

This game should be at a neutral field. How is it fair the Bills get a neutral field if they win?

 

Bills technically loss the game vs the Bengals. That game should have at least been a coin flip.

 

Bengals got screwed over.lol

Yeah, I thought they were making this a neutral field?  What happened?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...