Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reich New Head Coach


NJPanthers12
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Will Kunkel's interview with Reich is set to air this evening I think...

Either way, I'm pretty sure fans will much prefer this answer over talking about "a seven year plan" 🙄

The man is consistent, talking here about how winning in the NFL is all in the margins as he did in his press conference. I can tell that there will be no mixed messages from our HC.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Kudos to Dave for taking ultimate responsibility for a bad hire.  

Hate to keep beating up on Marty, but he should have realized after being a GM for two decades that Matt Rhule was a high risk gamble (coming from the college ranks) and not a good fit for a team with a new owner.

The 1st gamble was trusting Marty. But I digress and you’re right.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Darnold was very good when he came back from IR.

I doubt they bring him back because the new HC will want his own guy, but that stretch of 6 games was the best QB play we've seen in a Panthers jersey for a number of years.

Cracking Up Lol GIF

He had the worst single game passer rating in the history of our franchise to close the season against a mediocre Saints team starting Andy Dalton.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, frankw said:

Cracking Up Lol GIF

He had the worst single game passer rating in the history of our franchise to close the season against a mediocre Saints team starting Andy Dalton.

Stretch of 6 games = 1 game?

 

I mean he sucked royal balls in that 1 game.  No doubt about it.

But Oldham's point was the other games as well.

I'm not going to stick my head in the sand and ignore the 100+ QB ratings he got (which is tantamount to a Miracle) in those 5 other games. (well technically he had an 85 rating in one of them which we won)

 

You can not want Sam Darnold back and still acknowledge he was decent  for us (save for the sh-tshow at New Orleans(which we won anyway). 

 

I'm ready to move on from him but not ready to ignore what I saw.

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Stretch of 6 games = 1 game?

 

I mean he sucked royal balls in that 1 game.  No doubt about it.

But Oldham's point was the other games as well.

I'm not going to stick my head in the sand and ignore the 100+ QB ratings he got (which is tantamount to a Miracle) in those 5 other games. (well technically he had an 85 rating in one of them which we won)

 

You can not want Sam Darnold back and still acknowledge he was decent  for us (save for the sh-tshow at New Orleans(which we won anyway). 

 

I'm ready to move on from him but not ready to ignore what I saw.

You followed this man to a new team I'm not expecting us to agree on this.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

You followed this man to a new team I'm not expecting us to agree on this.

You shouldn't.

I'm not going to try to make you agree.

Just letting you know where I stand.

Won't ignore that he was for the first time in his career....EFFECTIVE...but am ready for a new Vet to sign (Brissett anyone?) here to hold the fort for whomever we are drafting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

This is why it's such a mediocre hire, imo.

They're not bothered at all that he's left.

I think it is unfair to say that until we see results... It is quite possible that he could learn from his mistakes and actually produce a good team here. I am not too worried what Colts fans think.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was playing around with the ESPN playoff predictor and it shows if 49ers and Rams finish with same record, the Rams hold the tiebreaker.     
    • This is my thinking as well. Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers.  I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win.  Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend.  If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 
    • I don’t know about shadowing and all that, but according to this, whatever we are doing is working 
×
×
  • Create New...