Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your unpopular opinion?

Cdparr7

By Cdparr7,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CanadianCat Veteran

CanadianCat

Posted
Posted

Unpopular opinion....

1. Most players on our roster that other teams would consider good are considered trash on this board.
2. There is a small handful of posters on this board that are miserable and ruin the general experience for most. 
3. We have a team that is in a good position to plunk in a QB and try to content. We are close. LFG!!

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OneBadCat Grand Master

OneBadCat

Posted
Posted (edited)

Matt Moore was a better QB than Jake Delhomme the moment he joined the team. He deserved a chance to compete with Jake in 08 and would have made us a more complete team. We would have beaten Arizona in the playoffs. Jake was the weak link holding us back that year. 

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CanadianCat Veteran

CanadianCat

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Matt Moore was a better QB than Jake Delhomme the moment he joined the team. He deserved a chance to compete with Jake in 08 and would have made us a more complete team. We would have beaten Arizona in the playoffs. Jake was the weak link holding us back that year. 

probably true... but EVERYONE loved Jake.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

What’s one of your core beliefs that get you shunned by the rest of the fanbase?

Here are mine. 

A) Brian Burns is overrated and will never be on the level of Peppers, Johnson, Rucker. Maybe Addison. 
 

B) Had John Fox been retained he would have had the same and likely more success than Rivera. 
 

C) I never really liked Christian McCaffrey. Was a playmaker but he really made our offense predictable. People rooting for him with the 49ers make me eye roll.

We will be stuck in mediocrity for the next X amount of years. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Unpopular opinion....

1. Most players on our roster that other teams would consider good are considered trash on this board.
2. There is a small handful of posters on this board that are miserable and ruin the general experience for most. 
3. We have a team that is in a good position to plunk in a QB and try to content. We are close. LFG!!

These aren't opinions, they're facts.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I see the comments daily.

 

Some guys brought up Cam not jumping on the ball in the game thread because Josh Johnson didn't dive on the ball.

We never see Luke Kuechly slander. Never see TD slander. Hell you don't even see Smitty slander and he was a ticking time bomb.

So what's your point? We have CMC slander too. We're allowed to not like players. And just to make you boil, mine is ... Cam Newton was not an elite QB. He was only very good.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, GOAT said:

tanking does not exist. it's a theory created by fans when they think their team is losing on purpose to get a good draft spot. teams don't tank, these guys all have to play / coach their hardest to earn their checks / contract increases / job security. trading key players for draft picks is not tanking, it's smart financially and helps rebuild the team.

We just need to change the name of the term. ZERO players will ever tank (unless they are gambling). Most coaches will not tank. I'd imagine many owners/GMs would like the team to tank but they can't control that. What we as fans are actually thinking when we say "tank" is that we are 100% ok if the team loses out, and we hope they lose out. We don't actually think/hope they throw a game. So ... we just need to come up with a new name for what we've be calling tanking. IOWL (I'm ok with losing) lol.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      The Ringer NFC Offseason podcast

      By frankw · Posted

      The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • HaricotVert
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...