Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your unpopular opinion?

Cdparr7

By Cdparr7,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CanadianCat Veteran

CanadianCat

Posted
Posted

Unpopular opinion....

1. Most players on our roster that other teams would consider good are considered trash on this board.
2. There is a small handful of posters on this board that are miserable and ruin the general experience for most. 
3. We have a team that is in a good position to plunk in a QB and try to content. We are close. LFG!!

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OneBadCat Grand Master

OneBadCat

Posted
Posted (edited)

Matt Moore was a better QB than Jake Delhomme the moment he joined the team. He deserved a chance to compete with Jake in 08 and would have made us a more complete team. We would have beaten Arizona in the playoffs. Jake was the weak link holding us back that year. 

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CanadianCat Veteran

CanadianCat

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Matt Moore was a better QB than Jake Delhomme the moment he joined the team. He deserved a chance to compete with Jake in 08 and would have made us a more complete team. We would have beaten Arizona in the playoffs. Jake was the weak link holding us back that year. 

probably true... but EVERYONE loved Jake.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

What’s one of your core beliefs that get you shunned by the rest of the fanbase?

Here are mine. 

A) Brian Burns is overrated and will never be on the level of Peppers, Johnson, Rucker. Maybe Addison. 
 

B) Had John Fox been retained he would have had the same and likely more success than Rivera. 
 

C) I never really liked Christian McCaffrey. Was a playmaker but he really made our offense predictable. People rooting for him with the 49ers make me eye roll.

We will be stuck in mediocrity for the next X amount of years. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Unpopular opinion....

1. Most players on our roster that other teams would consider good are considered trash on this board.
2. There is a small handful of posters on this board that are miserable and ruin the general experience for most. 
3. We have a team that is in a good position to plunk in a QB and try to content. We are close. LFG!!

These aren't opinions, they're facts.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I see the comments daily.

 

Some guys brought up Cam not jumping on the ball in the game thread because Josh Johnson didn't dive on the ball.

We never see Luke Kuechly slander. Never see TD slander. Hell you don't even see Smitty slander and he was a ticking time bomb.

So what's your point? We have CMC slander too. We're allowed to not like players. And just to make you boil, mine is ... Cam Newton was not an elite QB. He was only very good.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, GOAT said:

tanking does not exist. it's a theory created by fans when they think their team is losing on purpose to get a good draft spot. teams don't tank, these guys all have to play / coach their hardest to earn their checks / contract increases / job security. trading key players for draft picks is not tanking, it's smart financially and helps rebuild the team.

We just need to change the name of the term. ZERO players will ever tank (unless they are gambling). Most coaches will not tank. I'd imagine many owners/GMs would like the team to tank but they can't control that. What we as fans are actually thinking when we say "tank" is that we are 100% ok if the team loses out, and we hope they lose out. We don't actually think/hope they throw a game. So ... we just need to come up with a new name for what we've be calling tanking. IOWL (I'm ok with losing) lol.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By csx · Posted

      Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • kungfoodude
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • Tr3ach
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By Tr3ach · Posted

      I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...