Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The NFL is Rigged


Diehardpanth02
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That seems convenient. Just sayin'.

 

6 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

If its incompetence it would be more 50/50 you would assume.   Not clearly all calls going to one team.

There is absolutely zero theory or equation that predicts incompetence. It’s random.

Look, I love some evidence. Just some. I’m willing to listen. Do you guys have say the top 30-40 bad calls in high stake games in recent times that you can reasonable formulate (with numbers/stats) in even just a logical projection as to how the NFL benefitted in forming a conspiracy to make it play out? 

Because otherwise, like ever other fanbase, bad calls are rigged. Everyone thinks it. Look at their forums. If it was so glaring as some of you say, should be easy to prove.

If it were up to me there’s be refs in a booth watching replays calling plays, but only a couple. Chip in the ball and helmets and a laser grid field. Maybe in the future. For now we still have 70 year olds calling the shots.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL is rigged. Not by grand conspiracy but by inherited situational incompetence and ego trips. These are old white dudes in zebra outfits that can’t stand it when they are called out and told they are wrong.

All the proof you ever needed was the way they behaved when they made PI challengeable. The refs boycotted and refused to overturn calls despite clear evidence. This is because they are ignorant and indignant and run on power trips. 
 

It is absolutel bullshit that part time douchebags can change the outcome of entire seasons for NFL teams. These are players and coaches who have dedicated their entire lives to the game only to be cheated by some asshole who doesn’t like being barked at. fug that . It needs fixing, it needs change.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Diehardpanth02 said:

Bruh. I understand the friggin line dude. Once again the point I'm making is if where there is betting, there is a potential to be rigged. People stand to get rich from a money line, seems to easy to drop a pass, or make a bad call.

Doesn't sound like you understand it, if you can't understand why the house usually wins.

They make smart bets and set smart lines.  

But if you would rather believe a conspiracy, go ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, onmyown said:

 

There is absolutely zero theory or equation that predicts incompetence. It’s random.

Look, I love some evidence. Just some. I’m willing to listen. Do you guys have say the top 30-40 bad calls in high stake games in recent times that you can reasonable formulate (with numbers/stats) in even just a logical projection as to how the NFL benefitted in forming a conspiracy to make it play out? 

Because otherwise, like ever other fanbase, bad calls are rigged. Everyone thinks it. Look at their forums. If it was so glaring as some of you say, should be easy to prove.

If it were up to me there’s be refs in a booth watching replays calling plays, but only a couple. Chip in the ball and helmets and a laser grid field. Maybe in the future. For now we still have 70 year olds calling the shots.

Human nature is to lie. Ask Jesus, that's the only facts you need.

The games are decided by humans. Officials. Owners. Players. All of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mage said:

Doesn't sound like you understand it, if you can't understand why the house usually wins.

They make smart bets and set smart lines.  

But if you would rather believe a conspiracy, go ahead.

You still talking about betting. Go gamble bro. I really don't care how you spend your indentured dollars.

Once again, if money is involved. People get greedy. And when people get greedy, they set things up in their favor to win money. If your so naive to not believe so. Then you my friend, are living in la la land.

You caught me, I don't bet. I was pointing out that people do. And more money is made for the house when thing go how they expect. And btw, who is the house?

Is it the NFL?

Edited by Diehardpanth02
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

We all found out on February 7th 2016

It proved to me that Ron Rivera can get out coached if you give the opposite side 2 weeks to prepare. 

Remmers at RT vs. Von Miller?  Did we adjust to give him help with a back or TE?  It has been a while since I watched it, but I remember Remmers being on an island vs. the top sack master in the league. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...