Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The NFL is Rigged


Diehardpanth02
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That seems convenient. Just sayin'.

 

6 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

If its incompetence it would be more 50/50 you would assume.   Not clearly all calls going to one team.

There is absolutely zero theory or equation that predicts incompetence. It’s random.

Look, I love some evidence. Just some. I’m willing to listen. Do you guys have say the top 30-40 bad calls in high stake games in recent times that you can reasonable formulate (with numbers/stats) in even just a logical projection as to how the NFL benefitted in forming a conspiracy to make it play out? 

Because otherwise, like ever other fanbase, bad calls are rigged. Everyone thinks it. Look at their forums. If it was so glaring as some of you say, should be easy to prove.

If it were up to me there’s be refs in a booth watching replays calling plays, but only a couple. Chip in the ball and helmets and a laser grid field. Maybe in the future. For now we still have 70 year olds calling the shots.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL is rigged. Not by grand conspiracy but by inherited situational incompetence and ego trips. These are old white dudes in zebra outfits that can’t stand it when they are called out and told they are wrong.

All the proof you ever needed was the way they behaved when they made PI challengeable. The refs boycotted and refused to overturn calls despite clear evidence. This is because they are ignorant and indignant and run on power trips. 
 

It is absolutel bullshit that part time douchebags can change the outcome of entire seasons for NFL teams. These are players and coaches who have dedicated their entire lives to the game only to be cheated by some asshole who doesn’t like being barked at. fug that . It needs fixing, it needs change.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Diehardpanth02 said:

Bruh. I understand the friggin line dude. Once again the point I'm making is if where there is betting, there is a potential to be rigged. People stand to get rich from a money line, seems to easy to drop a pass, or make a bad call.

Doesn't sound like you understand it, if you can't understand why the house usually wins.

They make smart bets and set smart lines.  

But if you would rather believe a conspiracy, go ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, onmyown said:

 

There is absolutely zero theory or equation that predicts incompetence. It’s random.

Look, I love some evidence. Just some. I’m willing to listen. Do you guys have say the top 30-40 bad calls in high stake games in recent times that you can reasonable formulate (with numbers/stats) in even just a logical projection as to how the NFL benefitted in forming a conspiracy to make it play out? 

Because otherwise, like ever other fanbase, bad calls are rigged. Everyone thinks it. Look at their forums. If it was so glaring as some of you say, should be easy to prove.

If it were up to me there’s be refs in a booth watching replays calling plays, but only a couple. Chip in the ball and helmets and a laser grid field. Maybe in the future. For now we still have 70 year olds calling the shots.

Human nature is to lie. Ask Jesus, that's the only facts you need.

The games are decided by humans. Officials. Owners. Players. All of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mage said:

Doesn't sound like you understand it, if you can't understand why the house usually wins.

They make smart bets and set smart lines.  

But if you would rather believe a conspiracy, go ahead.

You still talking about betting. Go gamble bro. I really don't care how you spend your indentured dollars.

Once again, if money is involved. People get greedy. And when people get greedy, they set things up in their favor to win money. If your so naive to not believe so. Then you my friend, are living in la la land.

You caught me, I don't bet. I was pointing out that people do. And more money is made for the house when thing go how they expect. And btw, who is the house?

Is it the NFL?

Edited by Diehardpanth02
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

We all found out on February 7th 2016

It proved to me that Ron Rivera can get out coached if you give the opposite side 2 weeks to prepare. 

Remmers at RT vs. Von Miller?  Did we adjust to give him help with a back or TE?  It has been a while since I watched it, but I remember Remmers being on an island vs. the top sack master in the league. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...