Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Scheme


ericr0319
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, stan786 said:

I disagree a bit, mainly I think the majority of our Edge Rushers are built to play much better in a 3-4 other than YGM. I agree that NT and depth on the three DL spots are a need but also those tend to be spots you can bring in serviceable players for reasonable deals. I would argue that Anderson and Brown make find Ends in the scheme, and there are some good NT available in FA this offseason that generally dont come that expensive.

So I feel like its just a trade from having small ends for a 4-3 to having to find a NT for a 3-4, and pass rushers are much harder to find generally.

Anderson is a FA.  So that leaves Brown who is a starter at one end.  Putting names into holes in the roster doesn't work.  McCall/Roy are true NTs, let alone starting quality? YGM is a 5-tech?  We have two starting holes and 3, possibly 4, backups spots.  Honestly, I would shop YGM and see what we can get for him.  Once it's all said and done, Roy and McCall may not even make the roster with this new scheme.  Let's be honest here.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I don’t hope we do, but man we are paper thin. Same goes on the entire roster.

I think people need to expect another rebuilding year because as you said we need a bunch of pieces on offense as well.

This is said about every team's roster this time of year... You can't really lean into this type of thinking until after draft and free agency. Every team has expiring contracts and roster turnover. It's a matter of having your key pieces in place... not the depth at this point in the offseason.

 

ie... our oline at this point last year.... 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

You can find serviceable space eater NTs for a 3-4 in FA and the draft fairly easily. Brown I think will do much better as a 3-4 DE than a 4-3 DT. Burns, Barno, Haynes are tailor made as 3-4 OLBs. As others mentioned, re-signing Anderson as a 3-4 DE makes sense as well. I think the personnel is much more suited to 3-4 than 4-3 on the whole. Need to rebuild DL depth and find a ballhawk FS, but besides that, think we're pretty decently set-up for the shift.

Agreed. I don't know why anyone would worry about fit for guys barely deserving a roster spot like YGM. You can't possibly be satisfied with YGM as our starting 4-3 DE so if we have to sign or draft someone to upgrade him there, why not a 3-4 DE instead? Then throw in a NT and we're better off across the board than we were this past year, with our stars in a more natural fit to boot.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Mike Kaye posted this...

 

We don't have the personnel to run a 3-4 right now. We don't have the ends, we don't have the linebackers. Our secondary should be good to go as they can play man on the outside.

Horn isn't going to be wasted playing Free Safety. He can cover man up really well and you'll need that when you're covering space given up by the 4th rusher. 

I love odd man fronts but fans really need to understand that this, like under Ron when he was going to make the change, will be a process. Tepper needs to get out of the way and understand that he has a good staff and it will take time to get dudes in place. Haynes and Burns are the only true fits in the front 7 right now.

I'd look for us to take a guy like Jerrod Clark out of Coastal Carolina. 6'4 350 lbs and has an explosive first step as well as the ability to anchor a 0 tech.

Derrick Brown could be a 3 or 5 tech, Burns can slide down inside or even play the dog position. You could draft a guy like Nick Hampton out of App State to also run dog as he can cover and rush, almost identically to Burns considering he's 6'3 with like 83 inch arms or something ridiculous. Runs a 4.5 to 4.6 40. 

Might take a guy like Bumper Pool, All-American ILB out of Arkansas. He's not a speed demon but he is a very good football player.

Everyone I mentioned will likely be Day 3 picks. If we want to win sooner rather than later, I think we have to trade down to stack defensive talent. What do the Eagles and 49er's have? Great defensive players all over the Front 7. 

If we trade up to get a QB we are going to delay any progress on a defensive transition. Ron wasn't given time, let's see if Tepper will be patient this time around. If he had given Ron another three years instead of Rhule I could almost guarantee we would've been in the playoffs again.

Rash decision making rarely works out in this sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pick up a real anchor up the middle in free agency and draft Calijah Kancey (check his film holy balls) in the 2nd.

Run downs

OLBs: Burns, YGM

DEs: Kancey, Derrick Brown

NT: Free Agent


Mixed downs

OLBs: Burns, Haynes

DEs: Kancey, Ioannidis

NT: Brown

 

NASCAR

DEs: Burns, Barno

DTs: Kancey, Ioannidis
 

If a quarterback doesn’t fall to us and we can’t trade back, I’d fugg around and take another edge or corner at #9. I know we need a qb, but at this point I’d be down to build a perennial top 3 defense, match it with a great OL/run game, then just chuck Corral in and see if he sucks or not. If he does suck, go all in next year and put the rookie qb in an insanely good position to succeed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wolfcop said:

Coach Evero also said he will adjust his scheme to for the personnel. Therefore, his scheme may look slightly  different from year to year. 

Kinda silly to adjust his system due to a few low-end/under performing/back up players from our old 4-3 scheme.  Bite the bullet and basically retool the entire DL.  The back seven will be fine, not much concern there.  Don't hold up the plan because of a few miscast players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CamTheMan said:

Pick up a real anchor up the middle in free agency and draft Calijah Kancey (check his film holy balls) in the 2nd.

Run downs

OLBs: Burns, YGM

DEs: Kancey, Derrick Brown

NT: Free Agent


Mixed downs

OLBs: Burns, Haynes

DEs: Kancey, Ioannidis

NT: Brown

 

NASCAR

DEs: Burns, Barno

DTs: Kancey, Ioannidis
 

If a quarterback doesn’t fall to us and we can’t trade back, I’d fugg around and take another edge or corner at #9. I know we need a qb, but at this point I’d be down to build a perennial top 3 defense, match it with a great OL/run game, then just chuck Corral in and see if he sucks or not. If he does suck, go all in next year and put the rookie qb in an insanely good position to succeed. 

Ioannidis is a FA...he's still on our books due to voided* years. 

*I absolutely freaking HATE that accounting BS.  Let's not turn into the Saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Anderson is a FA.  So that leaves Brown who is a starter at one end.  Putting names into holes in the roster doesn't work.  McCall/Roy are true NTs, let alone starting quality? YGM is a 5-tech?  We have two starting holes and 3, possibly 4, backups spots.  Honestly, I would shop YGM and see what we can get for him.  Once it's all said and done, Roy and McCall may not even make the roster with this new scheme.  Let's be honest here.

Yeah I never mentioned Roy and McCall for a reason, I agreed we had to sign a NT and build some depth but as I said I think that's easier than what we were doing with playing small Edges at 4-3 ends.

Anderson is just a cheap natural resigning.

In a 4-3 we'd need to find another couple ends if we really wanted to run it because Haynes and Barno arent a real fit there, YGM has been fine but nothing special.

You can run Luvu and Burns at OLB and rotate in speed rushers that we do have in the 3-4.

I'd also try and move YGM but not sure what you can get for him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stan786 said:

Yeah I never mentioned Roy and McCall for a reason, I agreed we had to sign a NT and build some depth but as I said I think that's easier than what we were doing with playing small Edges at 4-3 ends.

Anderson is just a cheap natural resigning.

In a 4-3 we'd need to find another couple ends if we really wanted to run it because Haynes and Barno arent a real fit there, YGM has been fine but nothing special.

You can run Luvu and Burns at OLB and rotate in speed rushers that we do have in the 3-4.

I'd also try and move YGM but not sure what you can get for him.

If we had a ton of cap space, I'd be more inclined to pick up a few 3-4 D-linemen in FA and draft for depth.  That's still likely the plan, be we have to be creative and go 'Dollar General' shopping.  The last thing I want is a bunch of Ioannidis-type of contracts for short term rentals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

If we had a ton of cap space, I'd be more inclined to pick up a few 3-4 D-linemen in FA and draft for depth.  That's still likely the plan, be we have to be creative and go 'Dollar General' shopping.  The last thing I want is a bunch of Ioannidis-type of contracts for short term rentals.

Sure and that is what i'm saying, historically those 3-4 DL tend to come quite a bit cheaper than what you would need to spend to get another pass rusher. I dont think our team is built perfectly for either the 4-3 or 3-4 i'm just saying we will have an easier time playing to our strengths in a 3-4 and the holes will be cheaper to fill.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

You can find serviceable space eater NTs for a 3-4 in FA and the draft fairly easily. Brown I think will do much better as a 3-4 DE than a 4-3 DT. Burns, Barno, Haynes are tailor made as 3-4 OLBs. As others mentioned, re-signing Anderson as a 3-4 DE makes sense as well. I think the personnel is much more suited to 3-4 than 4-3 on the whole. Need to rebuild DL depth and find a ballhawk FS, but besides that, think we're pretty decently set-up for the shift.

I actually think that Brown would do pretty well as a 5 tech...we will need to find a NT though...IMO that's easier said than done...hope we are eyeing that position on day 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can tell you've done your research on him from this post, as I had part of it in that response at first but removed it as for whatever reason I just felt my explanation of what I was trying to say felt clunky and wasn't getting my point across. It's the varying his speeds during routes part. I actually think that's why he had so many people saying he didn't seem like he had urgency in his route running, because he does THAT so well, and I think sometimes people see it and think he's loafing it out there but he's really just playing mind games with the DB's a lot of the time. He was soooooo good at those "I'm going to fake only running a 5-7 yard slant to sit in the hole but half as second before I know the QB is going to throw me the ball I'm going to take off at full speed" type of routes. We loved running those with him, he'd just run a slow short slant while the action is to the other side of the field through a play action or first read to the opposite side, and then he'd just take off on just enough of an angle to give him space on the defender and catch the pass in stride so he never slows down and gets those long strides moving. And yes, he's great at improvising.  Part of it is that him and our QB have played together since the 8th grade, but it's also something Bryce excels at so I think the two of them will build chemistry on those fast.
    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different. Because again, I'm not assuming major injuries or games missed when I'm putting expectations out there for the season, I'm assuming good health.  If those other 3 WRs combine to miss a lot of time, then yes, he needs to get to 1k in that scenario.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
×
×
  • Create New...