Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers and CJ


razorwolf
 Share

Recommended Posts

IMO

For the panthers to get CJ Stroud they would need to move up to #3 pick with Cards to get a head of the colts, #5 pick with Seahawks, or #6 with Lions ahead of raiders and falcons!

Our new QB coach Josh McCown (which I believe will make a great coach) is very high on CJ, and I feel he’s the mostly like QB to become a franchise QB in this draft!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’ll have trade up to 1.

If we trade up to 3 the Colts will trade up to 1. 

The Colts obviously don’t want to part with two future 1’s to move up 3 spots so if Carolina wants it they can probably have Chicago’s pick 

Chicago needs as many picks as they can get. I’d be ok falling to 9 and taking one of the LT’s for an extra 1st in 2025

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

We’ll have trade up to 1.

If we trade up to 3 the Colts will trade up to 1. 

The Colts obviously don’t want to part with two future 1’s to move up 3 spots so if Carolina wants it they can probably have Chicago’s pick 

Chicago needs as many picks as they can get. I’d be ok falling to 9 and taking one of the LT’s for an extra 1st in 2025

For the bears to even consider going back all the way to 9 the starting point is 3 firsts and probably 2 seconds to even open up the dialogue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

We’ll have trade up to 1.

If we trade up to 3 the Colts will trade up to 1. 

The Colts obviously don’t want to part with two future 1’s to move up 3 spots so if Carolina wants it they can probably have Chicago’s pick 

Chicago needs as many picks as they can get. I’d be ok falling to 9 and taking one of the LT’s for an extra 1st in 2025

Chicago might not want to trade back all the way to 9 though. A couple people have floated the idea of us moving up to #3 and then up to #1 from 3 but I can't imagine how much capital that would take.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF and I mean IF CJ is the guy we think is the next Burrow, we have to trade up to 1 for him. It would be so easy for another team to jump us if we get to pick 3 or 5. We should probably do it before the draft to prevent any chaos. If we can do it and keep our 25 1st it will be a success IMO. 24 1st is probably certainly gone unless we trade a player like Burns. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

For the bears to even consider going back all the way to 9 the starting point is 3 firsts and probably 2 seconds to even open up the dialogue

https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/could-bears-trade-no-1-pick-to-panthers-for-brian-burns/3068604/?amp=1
 

@rebelrouserposted this in the draft forum. It’s definitely interesting…

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...