Poll: What do you want Panthers to do for QB?

[Zaximus]

14 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm getting the feeling that this may be how it shakes out in the end.

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

[thefuzz]

51 minutes ago, NAS said:

Even if it made sense for the Panthers, I don't think Carr chose to be a free agent to sign a 2 year bridge QB deal.  He will have other suiters for a bigger deal.

Not arguing, just saying that we don't really know what Carr wants.

This is a good coaching staff, a terrible division, and we are in the NFC...very few top end QB's right now.

In his shoes, I'm actually looking for a short deal, I'd want to hit the market again prior to 34.

[rebelrouser]

"(whatever it takes)"? I've heard a lot of people on this board use this phrase and it makes no sense. If you don't love Young or Stroud then this is just stupid. Someone (Colts) is going to get bent over trading up; hope it's not us.  

[Jon Snow]

2 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

It's hard to get a guage on what Fitterer has planned for the position.  I hesitate to think that Carr really changes anything they have/had planned but ya never know.  He he's definitely been better than anyone we've had since Cam. If it happens I think the contract he's given will tell us a lot about how long they think they will need for these rookies I suppose. 

[thefuzz]

26 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

I wouldn't mind Carr, at a fair contract, I don't expect cheap, but fair.  Then draft a QB at #9 if there is one we like and if not get best player at that spot. 

This seems most likely to me...wouldn't hate it.

[thefuzz]

9 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

My thoughts exactly.  We need to get a rook/young guy, but the team needs to start winning, and fast.

With this offensive staff, and if we can just get a piece or two more on offense, Carr would take us to the playoffs in year 1.  We need that.

[SmokinwithWilly]

3 hours ago, Eric4280 said:

I think it depends on traction for AROD to LV. If say GB has that pick, I think they’ll be wanting just whatever premium talent they can get. I really think we organically end up with stroud if HOU falls in love with Levis. It’s gonna be a fun off season.

If he does, it will be interesting to see what Adams thinks since he made the decision to not play with Rodgers. I'm not so sure the reunion would be a welcome one. 

[Mr. Scot]

2 hours ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

People are comparing Carr to Darnold and Mayfield?

[Wundrbread33]

3 hours ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

People label any QB on their second team as a “retread” unless they are a hall of fame type guy. 
 

They treat them all the same lol. 

[Navy_football]

I voted to get Carr and draft BPA. 

I want to draft BPA and get a vet QB - doesn't have to be Carr. 

[jopie87]

No option for run it back with Sammy D?!?!

Carr + a WR (Johnston) at 9 is my vote. 

[CamWhoaaCam]

Lamar Jackson shouldn't even be on this list. 

 

Lamar talk is just talk on this sub. Ravens have not put him on the trade block as of yet. I think they cave in and offer him more guaranteed money at the end of the day.

 

Aaron Rodgers is more likely to happen if we trade for a QB.

 

Not sure if Rodgers would mind coming here but he would be the dream scenario if we can't get a QB in the draft.

[thefuzz]

9 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Lamar Jackson shouldn't even be on this list. 

 

Lamar talk is just talk on this sub. Ravens have not put him on the trade block as of yet. I think they cave in and offer him more guaranteed money at the end of the day.

 

Aaron Rodgers is more likely to happen if we trade for a QB.

 

Not sure if Rodgers would mind coming here but he would be the dream scenario if we can't get a QB in the draft.

Don't think Bal values Lamar as much as Lamar values Lamar.

The Ravens have been a consistent winning team for 20 years, they were winning before Jackson, and if he's going to cost too much, they will move on and keep on winning.

The very rare team that is good with and without great QB play.

[Turtle]

Is there an option where we absolutely grab a QB, but if we miss on Stroud at 1.09 we take best player available and get another QB in a later round?

Opinion: No doubt we need to add a young QB to develop (along with Matt C.) in this system with all this coaching everyones hyped on, but does it have to be QB at 1.09 or higher at all costs? If BPA is a QB fine, but lets not box ourselves in lads!