Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Poll: What do you want Panthers to do for QB?


NAS
 Share

What do you want Panthers to do this offseason?  

217 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you want Panthers to do regarding QB situation this offseason

    • Draft best available QB at current draft position (#9)
    • Trade up with Bears (#1) and draft a QB (whatever it takes)
    • Trade up with Cardinals (#3) and draft a QB (whatever it takes)
    • Sign Derek Carr and draft best available player at #9
    • Trade for Lamar Jackson, fully guaranteed contract (Watson like trade)


Recommended Posts

Looking at the teams in front of us:

Moving up to #1 or even #3 might require more draft capital than the Panthers are willing to give up.

However, depending on how the first few picks fall, I could see Fitterer making a deal with his former associates in Seattle @ #5.  The Panthers might also make a deal with Detroit @ #6.  If neither of those organizations are going to select a QB, dropping back to #9 might be an option for additional picks.

https://www.tankathon.com/nfl

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What’s the ultimate goal? Winning a Super Bowl? If yes then you don’t trade up for a QB. In the last 20 years only 5 times has the winning QB of the Super Bowl been a draft pick above the 9th pick. Peyton Manning(2), Eli Manning(2) and Matthew Stafford. 
 

If you want to go further, only 12 of the 40 starting QBs in the last 20 Super Bowls have been drafted before the 9th pick. 
 

Some of the Super Bowl winning QBs drafted in the first round but after the 9th pick?  Big Ben (11th), Mahomes (10th), Rodgers (24th) and Joe Flacco (18th).  The rest were all drafted after the first round. 
 

There’s a lot of luck in finding a franchise, Super Bowling winning QB. But trading up into the top five has not given any team in the last 20 years a Super Bowl victory. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OldhamA said:

A Top 10 pick has to be a sure thing in my book.

None of these QBs are sure things, but you risk it for Stroud if he falls (he won't).

Young is the best QB in this Draft, but he's literally smaller than Murray. Levis I don't get the hype about at all and Richardson needs to sit at least a year.

No argument from me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mountainpantherfan2 said:

What’s the ultimate goal? Winning a Super Bowl? If yes then you don’t trade up for a QB. In the last 20 years only 5 times has the winning QB of the Super Bowl been a draft pick above the 9th pick. Peyton Manning(2), Eli Manning(2) and Matthew Stafford. 
 

If you want to go further, only 12 of the 40 starting QBs in the last 20 Super Bowls have been drafted before the 9th pick. 
 

Some of the Super Bowl winning QBs drafted in the first round but after the 9th pick?  Big Ben (11th), Mahomes (10th), Rodgers (24th) and Joe Flacco (18th).  The rest were all drafted after the first round. 
 

There’s a lot of luck in finding a franchise, Super Bowling winning QB. But trading up into the top five has not given any team in the last 20 years a Super Bowl victory. 

Mahomes was a QB traded up for… Just saying..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we trade whatever it takes to get the 1st pick and draft our franchise QB. It's a perfect storm in so many ways that in my mind it makes sense. We have a good enough team to win the division next year if said 1st overall pick plays even half way decent. The future picks won't mean much if we're making the playoffs. How often is the top overall team not drafting a QB because they have their QB in place? The availability of the top overall pick when there is a potential franchise QB in the draft class is only once that I can think of with Goff and Wentz. We have the perfect coaching staff in place to groom our future QB. Trade what it takes. The top 3 picks next year(QBs) may not even be available for trade if they are QB needy teams for the people saying trade up next year.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wesley17 said:

I hope we trade whatever it takes to get the 1st pick and draft our franchise QB. It's a perfect storm in so many ways that in my mind it makes sense. We have a good enough team to win the division next year if said 1st overall pick plays even half way decent. The future picks won't mean much if we're making the playoffs. How often is the top overall team not drafting a QB because they have their QB in place? The availability of the top overall pick when there is a potential franchise QB in the draft class is only once that I can think of with Goff and Wentz. We have the perfect coaching staff in place to groom our future QB. Trade what it takes. The top 3 picks next year(QBs) may not even be available for trade if they are QB needy teams for the people saying trade up next year.

Making plans a year early before season plays out is a losing strategy…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carr.

I was dead set against another reclamation project but I don’t trust any of these QBs enough to bet the farm on. 

This team is ready for a QB and Carr isn’t a reclamation project.  He isn’t chopped liver as they say, Panthers would probably be favored to win the division with him, I would think. 

For that matter if a QB they love fell to 9 you they still take him if they felt that strongly. I wouldn’t expect that to happen but if so, it’s a problem that can be lived with better than no QBs. And we need a room with at least one to train. Two being groomed is better but if Carr is the guy they will need an experienced backup. 
 

Edited by stratocatter
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...