Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gantt indicates the Panthers should bring in Carr

TheMaulClaw

By TheMaulClaw,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

nogoodbum Enthusiast

nogoodbum

Posted
Posted

Keeping in mind that the football world is in the peak of the 'LYING SEASON', that will continue thru free agency & the draft. Talking heads will post anything as "facts" for clicks & reads. Please consider all of these "facts" with a grain of salt. Carolina FO & coaches should talk to Carr & any other player that could improve the team. If Carr fits into what they want to achieve, offer him a reasonable deal, if he declines, move on to the next. Reasonable offer: three years in the 80-100M range, starter position to be determined by his performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Stuart Smith said:

 

 

Before I would pay Brissett 15 mil I would pay 30 for Carr. Difference of 15 mil for some decent vs a place holder. 3 years max while developing a quarterback. I hope whatever happens we draft a quarterback with our first pick.

30 mil is about my ideal price for Carr and about 10 mil my ideal price for Brissett. Now, would definitely prefer less but I would personally get a little concerned if we saw prices over that for either of them.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, Ornias said:

Would Brissett be an option? 2 year bridge contract for like 10-15m a year. 

I'd much prefer Brissett over Carr due to price and I don't believe the talent gap is a large as some people would point out. Like the difference between the 10-12 best QB in the league vs. the 15-17th

 

no matter what though we HAVE to get a rookie QB. we have kicked this can down the road for FAR too long 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

As much as we talk about Carr we sure are taking our sweet time meeting with him.

 

Is a meeting coming or is this just talk for a guy we aren't even interested in?

 

He's been a FA for 2 weeks now.

Seems like the Rodgers decision is the first domino needing to fall.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wolfcop Grand Master

Wolfcop

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

People better get used to Brissett.

 

Carr wants a bag and we don't have the money to go after him. We don't seem interested in Rodgers/Lamar either.

 

Brissett/Rookie QB always seemed like the most realistic option.

Not sure what we ultimately do, but $35M is not "a bag" for a veteran QB who has had the success that Carr has. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

Not sure what we ultimately do, but $35M is not "a bag" for a veteran QB who has had the success that Carr has. 

If and this is a big IF, the coaches think he's the franchise QB for the next 4-5 years, then sure.  But as a two-year bridge QB?  That's a lot of assets tied up for something that's not a long term solution, especially when that money can be allocated to other positions to shore them up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
heel31ok Mentor

heel31ok

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

If and this is a big IF, the coaches think he's the franchise QB for the next 4-5 years, then sure.  But as a two-year bridge QB?  That's a lot of assets tied up for something that's not a long term solution, especially when that money can be allocated to other positions to shore them up.

We could go after mike white for 4 yrs cheaper than what Carr wants for 1 yr.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Geno to Seattle not set in stone?

If you're Smith, do you risk leaving the OC and coaching staff that helped bring you back into the limelight?

If I were to guess, I'd say it probably depends at least somewhat on whether you think they're going to stick with you 🤔

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jb2288
      Time to Sign David Njoku

      By jb2288 · Posted

      He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • MrBubba
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By MrBubba · Posted

      Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • strato
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By strato · Posted

      I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...