Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Panthers' diverse hires partially motivated by compensation rules


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Having a problem with the policy suggests one hasn't thought it through or one is just looking for something to have a problem with 

A team wouldn't hire a candidate just because of their race because they actually need to be good to get a promotion.

There is no incentive to hire just because since then you aren't staffing in your best interests.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

“Tepper, I’m told, took note of that,” Breer writes. “And it was a motivator—in addition to helping the cause of Black coaches—to focus the hiring of Reich’s staff, particularly at the higher levels of it, to diverse candidates with upward mobility. So after the Reich hire, Carolina zeroed in on Denver defensive coordinator Ejiro Evero, who was right there with Vic Fangio as the most sought-after prospective DC league-wide, and Eagles QBs coach Brian Johnson for coordinator jobs.

“They landed Evero, couldn’t quite get Johnson (who’s in line to be promoted to offensive coordinator in Philly) but wound up with well-regarded Rams assistant head coach Thomas Brown as OC instead. And, of course, the first reason to write big checks to get those guys is the belief that they’ll be first-class lieutenants for Reich, the way Nick Sirianni and Matt Eberflus were for him in Indianapolis.”

https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/02/27/aaron-rodgers-packers-trade-ten-takeaways-mmqb

Well, if we fail...

We fail...

And people are going to look back at this. I still think hiring Ejiro was the wrong move solely for moving to a 3-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let me get this straight.  If you hire the person you feel is the best candidate but they happen to be a minority that being a minority was the only reason because of the compensation in picks you may receive later?  Bullshit. 

 

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started to have my suspicions we were consciously factoring it in after we hired Adrian Wilson too. Whether we truly are or not, can't say. All of them seem to be excellent and deserving. It's obviously not the main reason. But as a conscientious tiebreaker? Plausible. And honestly the league must have partly hoped for that by instituting the rule.

I've always thought it was a smart rule. Give minorities a chance to shine in higher profile assistant positions. If they flounder, you set your team back and get no compensation. If they earn a promotion elsewhere, you get valuable picks to compensate for losing an important member of your team.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

“Tepper, I’m told, took note of that,” Breer writes. “And it was a motivator—in addition to helping the cause of Black coaches—to focus the hiring of Reich’s staff, particularly at the higher levels of it, to diverse candidates with upward mobility. So after the Reich hire, Carolina zeroed in on Denver defensive coordinator Ejiro Evero, who was right there with Vic Fangio as the most sought-after prospective DC league-wide, and Eagles QBs coach Brian Johnson for coordinator jobs.

“They landed Evero, couldn’t quite get Johnson (who’s in line to be promoted to offensive coordinator in Philly) but wound up with well-regarded Rams assistant head coach Thomas Brown as OC instead. And, of course, the first reason to write big checks to get those guys is the belief that they’ll be first-class lieutenants for Reich, the way Nick Sirianni and Matt Eberflus were for him in Indianapolis.”

https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/02/27/aaron-rodgers-packers-trade-ten-takeaways-mmqb

What a hit piece. People in those positions have to be here for at least 2 years to count. I see potential that this staff is massacred at the end of next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

Just to play devil's advocate.

Wouldn't this discourage teams from signing minority head coaches because it gives an advantage to other teams?

Yea, seems like they would give some incentive for a team to hire a minority HC. (Besides avoiding be bashed in the media for not)

 

But geez...there are people who just want to tear others down, they complain about everything.  Tepper took a hit (unfairly) for not hiring Wilks.  He pointed out what a diverse admin staff he already has.  So, they (primarily Reich) went out and found the best coaches they could.  There happen to be minorities in the mix...so now they want to criticize him for hiring minorities?  It is a stupid comment.  Makes no sense.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The disparity between white coaches and black players has always been huge, and getting more black men (and other minorities) is very important since they make up the majority of the player base.  We hired great people and some of them happen to be minorities.

That's a win-win.  First- we get great coaches who will do a great job.  Second- if they get hired off after year 2, we get some picks.  Great!  But the most important thing is that we get much better coaches.

If we have success this year, and we get a lot of our coaches poached, that's a great sign for other assistants.  Come to Carolina to get on the fast track to a HC gig.  Will help ensure we have high quality coaches, even if they come in for a year or so.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ladypanther said:

Yea, seems like they would give some incentive for a team to hire a minority HC. (Besides avoiding be bashed in the media for not)

 

But geez...there are people who just want to tear others down, they complain about everything.  Tepper took a hit (unfairly) for not hiring Wilks.  He pointed out what a diverse admin staff he already has.  So, they (primarily Reich) went out and found the best coaches they could.  There happen to be minorities in the mix...so now they want to criticize him for hiring minorities?  It is a stupid comment.  Makes no sense.

I didn't want Wilks as our head coach, and I'm black. Tepper did take an unfair hit on that decision. If he had won against Tampa Bay and won the division, he would be our coach right now. I believe the game that cost him the job was the Tampa Bay game. That was Tom Brady's best game of the season, and he is supposed to be a defensive coach. It is also possible that Wilks was offered the job, but he didn't want to get rid of Al Holcomb, who, in my opinion, doesn't need to be a coordinator of anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

So let me get this straight.  If you hire the person you feel is the best candidate but they happen to be a minority that being a minority was the only reason because of the compensation in picks you may receive later?  Bullshit. 

 

Agree with this.  You may have two guys you are looking at and all other things being equal, the minority under-represented guy gets chosen.   To suggest we are hiring less than qualified candidates so we can get a draft pick some time in the future is nonsense.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s like being on the Flyers broadcast team feed so far
    • Boy the flyers look good early. Lots of bad plays and slow start by our team. Hope that changes before the score changes.
    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes into account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as another treading water year (at QB). I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. That’s how I look at it. 
×
×
  • Create New...