Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

nothing really to see here....


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I know that they are not interested in Roger's and probably not Carr also. But they will listen to Carr and assess a fall back position if necessary.  The goal is the draft and has always been since before you know who was canned. Now that he isn't calling the shots I would bet that the draft is where they look first and foremost. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Not always. Everyone pretty much knew that Burrow, Goldilocks and Luck were franchise QBs. This ain't the year for any surefire bets though. Young would be, but he's a little guy.

I didn't think.any rational person is suggesting trading to 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Aaron Rodgers makes this team a title contender, assuming his heart is still in the game.  Wouldn't give up much to get him though.

He's not been a title contender to for the team that has bent over backwards for him in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SOJA said:

Excellent news. We have tried the re-tread thing one too many times. It's time to get our guy and groom him. We have the perfect staff and team to build around a rookie. Go get your guy. 

It's not news.

King had addressed a rumor (which he stated up front was quite possibly bullsh-t) that nobody wanted Carr or Rodgers. Bleacher Report apparently quoted that blurb.

With news that every one of the teams in question (including us) is now scheduled to meet with Carr at least, Bleacher Report has taken the story down.

nevermind-ignore-it.gif

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, csx said:

I didn't think.any rational person is suggesting trading to 1.

Reality is, if you don't trade up to #1 you likely miss out on your guy(also doubt bears want to drop all the way to #9). You have to hedge your bets by taking the best available FA. And hope your guy falls in the draft.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Not always. Everyone pretty much knew that Burrow, Goldilocks and Luck were franchise QBs. This ain't the year for any surefire bets though. Young would be, but he's a little guy.

And those picks weren’t for sale nor will they be when that happens again. Basically we have to be the worst team in the league to get one of those guys and that’s not happening with our new staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's not news.

King had addressed a rumor (which he stated up front was quite possibly bullsh-t) that nobody wanted Carr or Rodgers. Bleacher Report apparently quoted that blurb.

With news that every one of the teams in question (including us) is now scheduled to meet with Carr at least, Bleacher Report has taken the story down.

nevermind-ignore-it.gif

lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, csx said:

I didn't think.any rational person is suggesting trading to 1.

I don't think it's irrational to trade to one depending upon your belief in the prospect, but it is ill-advised if you're just trading to one because you just gotta "try." I chuckle at that notion, and I don't think that Fitterer will go about business in that way.

Tepper was extremely clear about using resources willy-nilly. Those days are likely over, unless someone wants to be fired. Wiser, or at least more thought-out, decisions are on the horizon.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...