Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers will 100% trade up and draft a QB


GOAT
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, GOAT said:

Bet your savings on it, bet the house on it. 

Stop making threads about Carr, Lamar, Fields.

They've gathered some picks for ammo. 

Our GM is a trade happy wheel and dealer.

Our owner is a trigger pulling risk taker.

Our staff is designed to draft and develop a QB.

Nobody has mentioned that the guys on our roster are the answer.

The team knows what the fans want, and they know the time is now.

The social media has constant content on QB prospects and mock drafts. They always tip their hand.

Who are they trading up for and which spot? What will they give up? Nobody knows yet. But it is 100% happening. I have never been more confident about their intentions to do something. 

The sooner you realize this is 100% happening, the sooner we can move on from discussing retreads, the sooner we can stop whining about the pros and cons of doing this.

It is happening, let it happen. Get ready. No I will not charge you for the gambling advice. Lock of the century boys.

 

Ceo Happening GIF by Kuali

 

high IQ post

reichs downfall in indy was the reliance on journeymen being the answer. he is a smart guy and won't make the same mistake twice

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The conversation always seem to be either draft a rookie or bring in a vet. Fitteter said he was swinging for the fence which means he will do both. He will draft a qb likely in day 1 and will bring in a vet. Reich wants a winning season right away.  So does Tepper and so do I. We have to do better than 7-10  next year and should. So we won't put all our eggs in 1 basket but take a few swings to ensure success. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

The conversation always seem to be either draft a rookie or bring in a vet. Fitteter said he was swinging for the fence which means he will do both. He will draft a qb likely in day 1 and will bring in a vet. Reich wants a winning season right away.  So does Tepper and so do I. We have to do better than 7-10  next year and should. So we won't put all our eggs in 1 basket but take a few swings to ensure success. 

We get a vet regardless of whether we intend them to be a bridge QB or a backup to a high rookie draft pick. There's no way we go into the season with Corral as QB2. It's just going to end up being about maximizing resources to get the most bang for our buck, and future development. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

The conversation always seem to be either draft a rookie or bring in a vet. Fitteter said he was swinging for the fence which means he will do both. He will draft a qb likely in day 1 and will bring in a vet. Reich wants a winning season right away.  So does Tepper and so do I. We have to do better than 7-10  next year and should. So we won't put all our eggs in 1 basket but take a few swings to ensure success. 

I've been thinking this is the plan all along.  I just cannot see them gambling everything on a rookie from day one. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GOAT said:

Bet your savings on it, bet the house on it. 

Stop making threads about Carr, Lamar, Fields.

They've gathered some picks for ammo. 

Our GM is a trade happy wheel and dealer.

Our owner is a trigger pulling risk taker.

Our staff is designed to draft and develop a QB.

Nobody has mentioned that the guys on our roster are the answer.

The team knows what the fans want, and they know the time is now.

The social media has constant content on QB prospects and mock drafts. They always tip their hand.

Who are they trading up for and which spot? What will they give up? Nobody knows yet. But it is 100% happening. I have never been more confident about their intentions to do something. 

The sooner you realize this is 100% happening, the sooner we can move on from discussing retreads, the sooner we can stop whining about the pros and cons of doing this.

It is happening, let it happen. Get ready. No I will not charge you for the gambling advice. Lock of the century boys.

 

Ceo Happening GIF by Kuali

 

Mayb so, but we will suffer for that mistake.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...