Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ryan Poles trying to drive up the cost of the #1 pick


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Fitterer should be dangling Burns in leu of one or two of the future first rounders.  Chicago needs a DE badly, and also has a $100 mill in cap space to sign Burns without blinking.  Otherwise they should have traded Burns to LA and used that ammo (2 firsts reported) to move up for the QB of the future.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NJPanthers89 said:

Fitterer should be dangling Burns in leu of one or two of the future first rounders.  Chicago needs a DE badly, and also has a $100 mill in cap space to sign Burns without blinking.  Otherwise they should have traded Burns to LA and used that ammo (2 firsts reported) to move up for the QB of the future.  

Good point I am sure it’s being considered 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NJPanthers89 said:

Fitterer should be dangling Burns in leu of one or two of the future first rounders.  Chicago needs a DE badly, and also has a $100 mill in cap space to sign Burns without blinking. 

 

5 minutes ago, NAS said:

Good point I am sure it’s being considered 

The team his said consistently (and repeatedly) that they're not trading Brian Burns.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2023 at 7:56 AM, LinvilleGorge said:

As he should. He has the golden ticket. If he gives it to you, you can save football in *insert flailing NFL city here*.

There is no guarantee the first pick will even be a starter in three years let alone the savior for a team. The only thing guaranteed is that you have given away your future picks on a gamble.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2023 at 4:00 PM, MHS831 said:

This is so risky and bold-- but I have no doubt that Tepper is now pushing the panic button and they will make a very bold move.  

I fully expect us to lose three firsts, a second to move up. 

“panic button” + “very bold move” = desperation

In both my professional and personal life, I have never seen an action or decision made in desperation that had a positive outcome; in fact, it often made things worse.  It must be an unwritten law of Karma…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/7/2023 at 9:43 AM, OldhamA said:

Exactly.

Roll the dice at #9. Roll it again next year and the year after if he busts. Don't trade all three of those picks for one chance.

It’s often argued that you should choose quality over quantity however, it’s also true that “quantity has a quality of its own.”

History buffs may remember that in WW2, we deployed many, many more lighter duty Sherman tanks against the more heavily armored Panzers and Tigers, which were superior but fewer in number.  Simply put, we had more tanks on more battle fields and engagements than the Germans.

Keep the 24 and 25 draft picks.  Put more tanks on the field.

Edited by bythenbrs
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burns isn't going anywhere. He is currently the face of our franchise, he's a solid young DE that gets better every year, and he was a determining factor for some of the new coaches joining our team.

If you think he's an option to be traded, I really can't help you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2023 at 8:13 AM, LinvilleGorge said:

But put yourself in Fitts' shoes. You have an owner desperate for a franchise QB. He's run out of patience waiting. If you sit there at #9 and a QB doesn't fall and you have to go into the season with another mediocre vet retread or a third tier rookie or Matt Corral at QB, you're a walking dead man. You're as good as fired. Make a bold move for a QB and you've at least bought yourself time.

The time is now. Everyone feels it.

 

And if that bold move fails then you are out the door as well. Cant put all your eggs in that one basket. Best to have a vet and a drafted guy to increase chances you will be successful.  How many qbs make it through the season uninjured. You need two guys who can win games if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

And if that bold move fails then you are out the door as well. Cant put all your eggs in that one basket. Best to have a vet and a drafted guy to increase chances you will be successful.  How many qbs make it through the season uninjured. You need two guys who can win games if needed.

I'd rather do something to keep my job now even if it means maybe get fired in two years versus getting fired now for not doing the thing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

They also said CMC wasn't getting traded.  It's true until it isn't.  Remember it's all very fluid...

Absolutely. I'm not a trade Burns guy, but it's entirely possible that both the Bears and Cardinals would want him in a trade scenario. If these teams said there's no way we're accepting a trade without Burns being included, I would think the Panthers would have to relent. Contingent on free agency, the Panthers could be going into the draft with an injured Coral as an option at quarterback.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

They also said CMC wasn't getting traded.  It's true until it isn't.  Remember it's all very fluid...

There was a pretty big change on that front though (a fired coach).

Is there a change like that you can anticipate happening now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...