Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Via Panthers Wire via The Athletic , Person says we like AR, but not enough. Buzz about the 3rd


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

There is absolutely no way he could possibly know this.  

Even a few days ago Matt Miller was saying he get the sense the Panthers were "all in" on Richardson.

I don't really believe it, but it's not like isn't contradicting reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

Just give me Hendon Hooker. Local kid with a good head on his shoulders. Age and injury don’t concern me since we won’t have to mortgage our future to draft him.

The problem with Hooker is he isnt worth 1st or maybe even a second. But how do you know what other teams think? Who says he doesnt get snatched up before he gets to whatever pick you deem his value is?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Even a few days ago Matt Miller was saying he get the sense the Panthers were "all in" on Richardson.

I don't really believe it, but it's not like isn't contradicting reports.

I dont believe either as we are literally one day out of the combine and still have in house interviews etc and more importantly there is no fuging way anyone in the front office A) has a clue of the direction yet and even more importantly B) is telling Joe Person, Leaky, Verge fuging anyone what their plans potentially are.

 

People need to step back and use some logic.  If anyone told Person that it was clearly to plant a story but I dont even believe that happened

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

So if I get this right, Person is saying someone might take AR higher because of an outstanding performance at the Combine.  Or, maybe they wont take him higher...

 

That is great journalism

I think the Huddle is his inside source. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Source?  Not calling you out, just curious if it is anything recent.  I wouldn't mind Levis if that is who our staff likes.  

Naw I don’t have sources man…I just think it is very possible.  He definitely has some moldable traits.  He can probably start sooner than AR as well.  He worries me but getting all the way to #1 is too expensive if it is even possible.  I don’t like 3 first for CJ even if he is my #1 guy.  That just hasn’t worked out in the past IMO.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Wolfcop said:

Personally, I favor Stroud. But if this staff sees Levis as the future, I'm in. 

exactly my point.  I mean, I don't think the Mona Lisa was a good choice for Da Vinci--I would have told him, "Bulldogs playing Poker" is your best bet.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

My money is on it being Levis right now. It think they try to trade with the Cardinals if possible and let someone else get Young and Stroud.  Just a feeling I have based on nothing but my itching left testicle. 

Levis fits the Reich mold:

Chargers- Rivers = Big Family

Eagles- Wentz = Big Injuries

Eagles- Foles = Big Dong

Colts- Ryan = Big dry cleaning bill

Panthers- Levis = Big Mayo Arm

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Riverboat Ron said:

Levis fits the Reich mold:

Chargers- Rivers = Big Family

Eagles- Wentz = Big Injuries

Eagles- Foles = Big Dong

Colts- Ryan = Big dry cleaning bill

Panthers- Levis = Big Mayo Arm

 

I take it you are not a Levis fan?  I've watched at most 5 live plays of a KY game. Couldn't tell you a thing about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

I take it you are not a Levis fan?  I've watched at most 5 live plays of a KY game. Couldn't tell you a thing about him.

  ???

5 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

The difference between he and Stroud is not a wide as you think as far as the tape goes. But I think their pro days might have a sway one way or the other. Don't get caught up in the Underwear Olympics hype. The difference has to outweigh the cost to acquire as well. If they view it a push they may wait for someone else to pay top dollar for the first choice before swooping in to get the guy left. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd edited to be more clear where he was ahead of league average, but realize it was easily missed, sorry.  I do hope he falls off a cliff production wise because if he actually continues at this pace it's highly likely the TDs come and then he'll be a real problem. Anyway, to the stats... Shough is substantially better than the average in completion percentage, YPG, and INT% (68% vs 64.4% and 237 vs 215 and 1.7 vs 2.2). He is pretty close to the average in Y/A (7.14 vs 7.1) and rating (91.63 vs 91.8). He is a bit below the average in TDs per game (1.3 vs ~1.5, which is hard to average exactly due to the number of players that are part of this stat), QBR (51.54 vs 54.7) and quite a bit below in TD% (3% vs 4.7%). In advanced stats, he's above the league average in intended air yards/attempt (8.1 v 7.7) and on target % (76.8 vs 74.6), while barely below is in bad throw % (16.1 vs 16.0). This jives with what I've seen - decent young player, playing at a level that looks like a veteran starter, on a bad team. I've always said (and this is true of Bryce too, I even mentioned it this year) that I am less concerned with 30+ yard bombs than consistency at 15+ yards, because you need to be able to threaten past the sticks. Shough is doing that. Vs us in week 15 he had ~one third of his passes 15ish or more yards and he was money on them, and that wasn't really an exception, he has had some nice throws outside of that.  All that said, dude is just super new to the league, and once film gets out, if he does have limitations they will be exploited. No way he can get OROTY. And thanks for the kind words - I am prone to hyperbole at times, but I'm also just impressed by Shough. We'll see if he can keep it up (I hope not, unless the Saints randomly trade him lol)
    • To be fair, going from 2 wins, to 5 wins, to 8 wins at least is a pretty big positive no matter how insufferably miserable a select handful in this group want to make everything.
    • Yeah Moore is definitely going to be a problem.  I remember he was the favorite for our job at one point in time.  
×
×
  • Create New...