Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per Rich Eisen: “The Bears are long down the road to trading the first overall pick. The teams have been identified, compensation is being hammered out.”


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Varking said:

I would prefer a DE who can get sacks plus play the run. Burns is a liability in the run game. 

Well he's playing OLB next year, so.

Also, here's the thing - if Fitterer had traded Burns for 2 first round picks+ then he could make this rumoured trade up without too much long-term damage done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Who are the teams that are shooting for pick #1?. Atlanta will supposedly be in the mix along with Panthers and likely Colts. This will be a shootout for number one spot.

I think Atlanta is in trolling to drive up our draft capital  if so. This division  is ruthless

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tecc86 said:

 

Yeah I mean why would we want a career 67% passer, a little over 4k yards a season, 2.5:1 TD:Int ratio and almost 100 QB Rating

 

Is he Pat Mahomes? No, he's pretty fuging good though and the fact that you think ending up like Dak is a DOWNSIDE is hilarious.

You're willing to trade 3 first round picks for Dak?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's why I was advocating for just sticking with Rhule through the season. Once we didn't fire him after his second season like we should have, we should've just seen our mistake through so that we could harvest the fruits of our mistake. We definitely have a top 5 pick if Rhule hadn't been fired. Potentially top 3.

 

I’ve been preaching this from day 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

This isn’t true but if it is it’s the Colts.  Just my opinion 

This makes the most sense. They not only get their pick of the lot, they get to jump and screw over a division rival. The price should work out for both since the Bears only move down to #4 and get their pick of the non-QB prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Everyone just assumes we would be drafting Stroud in this hypothetical trade up. I'm not at all certain that's true.

This scares me man…giving up 3 firsts or more to go up for someone that isn’t Young or CJ is terrifying.  lol

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

Don’t think so at all. I’d say young is favorite 

Selecting him without giving up future picks is one thing. Trading up from nine to take a QB who is shorter and lighter than Matt Corral is a very risky move for a GM who needs a legit QB now.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...