Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JOE PERSON: Panthers will not pursue Lamar Jackson

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

KBRed Community Regular

KBRed

Posted
Posted

If we miss out on the top four...trade back, get extra picks, and fill out with offensive weapons, 3-4 defensive players, and Hendon Hooker....We have the staff to coach up anyone. Age doesn't scare me too much, given non-running QB lifespans in the league.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bythenbrs Grand Master

bythenbrs

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I think there is a valid real plan with hooker included. 

I maybe the only one that doesnt want to ultra force getting some "savior" QB. 

You're not the only one...

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers... "

Edited by bythenbrs
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bythenbrs Grand Master

bythenbrs

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, KBRed said:

If we miss out on the top four...trade back, get extra picks, and fill out with offensive weapons, 3-4 defensive players, and Hendon Hooker....We have the staff to coach up anyone. Age doesn't scare me too much, given non-running QB lifespans in the league.

Draft him at the very tail end of R1 and we get five years on that first contract.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rags Mentor

Rags

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Welp looks like the owners have come together. Nobody is even going to offer him a contract.lol Browns are stuck with that Watson contract. The rest of the owners aren't having it.

 

 

yessir lol, this is blatant as hell.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, bythenbrs said:

Collusion?  How about each owner independently looked at the Watson contract and projectile vomited?

It's now what, six teams to make a statement that they don't want Jackson? That's really odd. This is smokescreen season and throwing off other teams as to what you plan to do during the off-season is half the game. It's in teams' interest to obscure what they're doing, often leaking false information, to put pressure on other franchises. However, it seems that teams are definitely making statements one by one of their intent.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sgt Schultz Grand Master

Sgt Schultz

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

The collusion is real!

The NFL only permits one badly managed Cleveland Browns franchise to exist at any given point in time.

Well, we have the first runner up Arizona Cardinals.  They went even further and not only pushed all the chips into the center for Murray after they were talking about parting company with him, but did the same thing with Kingsbury at almost the exact same time.

"Let us make a place for you at our poker table, Mr. Bidwill."

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • UnluckyforSome
      NBC Sports 2026 NFL GM rankings

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      I think Canales goes before Young in that scenario.
    • tukafan21
      Joe Person: Panthers are NOT expected to extend Bryce Young before the 2026 season

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick, as opposed to bringing in a vet to start until the rookie is ready. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • strato
      Brown on BY9 while talking to Chris Long

      By strato · Posted

      I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
×
×
  • Create New...