Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If... AR drops to 9, do you take him then?


musicman
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It would be nice if one of these QBs makes it to 9 and we have all of those picks to build around the rookie. 

 

1 minute ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I agree with this. I don’t think this is likely though, and I would be happy to see the Panthers make a move if the staff feels strongly about any of the top 4

If AR or Levis is worth a first, then I'd think that Hooker has to be worth a second. Just food for thought.

I do think that we're going to do our damndest to move up though. I just hope that we don't let Poles take our dignity.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I agree with this. I don’t think this is likely though, and I would be happy to see the Panthers make a move if the staff feels strongly about any of the top 4

If they think a certain player is their guy I’ll back them until they give me a reason not to, which hopefully won’t happen.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Martin said:

I almost think Seattle resigning Geno makes it more likely they take AR. It would be a perfect situation where he can sit, learn and develop behind Geno.

Not really considering it’s a 3 year deal, drafting a QB this year almost negates their advantageous rookie contract. Beyond that having more players at a position especially of the caliber Geno played last year reduces the chances of drafting a player at the same position. Adding in Pete Carrols age, he’s most likely hitching his wagon to Geno and investing in him for his last chance at another ring. I could see them taking a QB at 5 but pick 5 is by no means the floor for Anthony Richardson. His price is at an all time high after the combine, I expect it to revert a small bit once scouts hear themselves back towards assessing tape.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 

If AR or Levis is worth a first, then I'd think that Hooker has to be worth a second. Just food for thought.

I do think that we're going to do our damndest to move up though. I just hope that we don't let Poles take our dignity.

Hooker is worth a 2nd, but does a desperate team like Tampa use their first on him and leave us with nothing if we go that route? Counting on a QB in the second is definitely risky too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, top dawg said:

 

If AR or Levis is worth a first, then I'd think that Hooker has to be worth a second. Just food for thought.

I do think that we're going to do our damndest to move up though. I just hope that we don't let Poles take our dignity.

i think the panthers 59th pick is awful hard not to use on him *if the top3-4 doesnt work.

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...