Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Kunkel says we're only "seriously interested" in three

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

If they want someone that can start day 1, that only leaves 1, maybe 2 QBs(Young and maybe Stroud). Levis is not ready to start.

If Levis isn’t ready to start after playing in pro style systems and being 24 when the season starts then we shouldn’t draft him. All 3 should start day 1. AR is the only one of the top projected 4 if we drafted that should sit half a season or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, PantherFanInPhilly said:

No matter who reports it…I am not sure why the Panthers not being interested in a rookie qb that’s nowhere close to being NFL ready is that hard to believe. 

I remember a lot of fans talking about how great Gil Brandt was when he spoke positively of Cam Newton prior to the draft.

Later on, when Brandt pointed up some issues in a then veteran Newton's game, some of those same fans came back and called him an old codger.

It's a time-honored Huddle tradition that a reporter's reliability depends mostly on whether or not you agree with their opinion. So if you think the Panthers should draft Anthony Richardson, Kunkel's likely a hack right now 😕

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Doesn't matter what we do, there will be a sizeable faction of the Huddle who thinks we've paved the way to a dynasty and a roughly equally sizeable faction who thinks we've doomed ourselves to a decade of bottom feeding. 

I totally trust the coaching staff... Until they make a decision that I disagree with 😕

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I remember a lot of fans talking about how great Gil Brandt was when he spoke positively of Cam Newton prior to the draft.

Later on, when Brandt pointed up some issues in a then veteran Newton's game, some of those same fans came back and called him an old codger.

It's a time-honored Huddle tradition that a reporter's reliability depends mostly on whether or not you agree with their opinion. So if you think the Panthers should draft Anthony Richardson, Kunkel's likely a hack right now 😕

Gil Brandt and Will Kunkel, truly on the same plain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
Just now, ForJimmy said:

I think we trade up to 3 and draft Levis just to keep things interesting in the Huddle...

Yep I think once the smoke clears we’re stuck with Levis

I know they’re desperately trying to get to 1 but I’m not sure it happens 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

If Levis isn’t ready to start after playing in pro style systems and being 24 when the season starts then we shouldn’t draft him. All 3 should start day 1. AR is the only one of the top projected 4 if we drafted that should sit half a season or more.

From what I saw of Levis this past season, he needs more time in the oven.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Oh yeah, that's absolutely what I meant by that analogy 🙄

Okay, what did you mean? People here are giving Kunkel poo for being a nobody that seems to make less than accurate predictions. How is Gil Bradnt, someone's who career in the NFL that spanned decades, analogous to him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

From what I saw of Levis this past season, he needs more time in the oven.

I just don't think what's between his ears can be fixed. It's similar to Sam Darnold. He'll need an almost perfect team around him to make it in this league from what I've watched. I could be wrong, but it's just my opinion from what I've seen.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • catnip
      Johnathon brooks

      By catnip · Posted

      Why do we always let our good players go ?   CMC was injured and we let him go . Now we face him Monday night .  We know what Chuba can do . We know what Rico can do .  We signed Chuba so why not sign Rico .   we don't know what we have in Brooks ,  Let him and Eteine go at it in camp . Keep the better player .  Don't let your proven players leave .
    • Candler Cat
      Mnf uniform combo White uni. Black helmet & socks

      By Candler Cat · Posted

    • Khyber53
      How many Qbs can you name better than Bryce Young?

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Oh, I get it. I called him Peewee for the first couple of years. He is too small to be an NFL QB. It wasn't as much of a problem in college, even in the SEC, because every player in the NFL is the size and speed of the biggest 22 on your entire college team.  I was left scratching my head over the pick and what we traded to get him (and yes, that cost analysis is unavoidable). Now we're sunk into the third season and the kid just popped a frikkin' amazing game out there where he showed every mark of what you need in a top end QB. Great passing, mobility, guts, toughness (that ankle must have been killing him) and the ability to put a team on his back to claw back a win. He didn't win it with his arm so much as by getting the ball to the right people at the right time, but that is what the best do. Do I believe he's going to be our QB of the future here? I'm still out on that. Way out on that. But I'm at least intrigued. Can he replicate what he did or even get close? Can he perform well against the power opponents we have left on the schedule? Heck, can he even beat New Orleans this season?  Right now, my personal feeling is that he'd make a heck of a back-up QB. He could prove me wrong and excel, though. Maddening as it is, that'd be the best outcome ever. Or he could have just hit his peak. And that would be bittersweet because then we start the whole thing over again. I don't see a reclaimation project QB out there right now that Canales can work his magic on.
×
×
  • Create New...