Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Kunkel says we're only "seriously interested" in three


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

If they want someone that can start day 1, that only leaves 1, maybe 2 QBs(Young and maybe Stroud). Levis is not ready to start.

If Levis isn’t ready to start after playing in pro style systems and being 24 when the season starts then we shouldn’t draft him. All 3 should start day 1. AR is the only one of the top projected 4 if we drafted that should sit half a season or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, PantherFanInPhilly said:

No matter who reports it…I am not sure why the Panthers not being interested in a rookie qb that’s nowhere close to being NFL ready is that hard to believe. 

I remember a lot of fans talking about how great Gil Brandt was when he spoke positively of Cam Newton prior to the draft.

Later on, when Brandt pointed up some issues in a then veteran Newton's game, some of those same fans came back and called him an old codger.

It's a time-honored Huddle tradition that a reporter's reliability depends mostly on whether or not you agree with their opinion. So if you think the Panthers should draft Anthony Richardson, Kunkel's likely a hack right now 😕

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Doesn't matter what we do, there will be a sizeable faction of the Huddle who thinks we've paved the way to a dynasty and a roughly equally sizeable faction who thinks we've doomed ourselves to a decade of bottom feeding. 

I totally trust the coaching staff... Until they make a decision that I disagree with 😕

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I remember a lot of fans talking about how great Gil Brandt was when he spoke positively of Cam Newton prior to the draft.

Later on, when Brandt pointed up some issues in a then veteran Newton's game, some of those same fans came back and called him an old codger.

It's a time-honored Huddle tradition that a reporter's reliability depends mostly on whether or not you agree with their opinion. So if you think the Panthers should draft Anthony Richardson, Kunkel's likely a hack right now 😕

Gil Brandt and Will Kunkel, truly on the same plain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

If Levis isn’t ready to start after playing in pro style systems and being 24 when the season starts then we shouldn’t draft him. All 3 should start day 1. AR is the only one of the top projected 4 if we drafted that should sit half a season or more.

From what I saw of Levis this past season, he needs more time in the oven.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Oh yeah, that's absolutely what I meant by that analogy 🙄

Okay, what did you mean? People here are giving Kunkel poo for being a nobody that seems to make less than accurate predictions. How is Gil Bradnt, someone's who career in the NFL that spanned decades, analogous to him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

From what I saw of Levis this past season, he needs more time in the oven.

I just don't think what's between his ears can be fixed. It's similar to Sam Darnold. He'll need an almost perfect team around him to make it in this league from what I've watched. I could be wrong, but it's just my opinion from what I've seen.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...