Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB breakdowns by Josh McCown


Martin
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Doyle said:

Can we get a recap for those that don't have the time to watch these?  Thanks!

McCown likes all three. They mostly show good plays, but did show some stuff he didn't like as much. They did wonder if Levis and Stroud can be more consistently mechanically sound instead of relying on arm strength alone as Levis seemed to do at times in college. I finished the Young video just a couple minutes ago and they didn't find as much wrong with his game as the other two. They called Young a point guard on a football field and loved how he would move the offense around and call out things at the line instead of just doing the fake clap a lot of college QBs do.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

McCown likes all three. They mostly show good plays, but did show some stuff he didn't like as much. They did wonder if Levis and Stroud can be more consistently mechanically sound instead of relying on arm strength alone as Levis seemed to do at times in college. I finished the Young video just a couple minutes ago and they didn't find as much wrong with his game as the other two. They called Young a point guard on a football field and loved how he would move the offense around and call out things at the line instead of just doing the fake clap a lot of college QBs do.

My interpretation was that he was very hesitant on Levis and had to dig a bit deeper to find positive thing. They even said they needed two games to be able to do a proper analysis. But maybe I misread the analysis.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

We’ve all bickered for months in this board but I think it’s clear. As a whole, we want Stroud first. 

I just fear the price. And he is not necessarily the next greatest thing...just maybe the safest bet of this draft. We will not be able to fill some other holes if we try to move up to 1.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

I just fear the price. And he is not necessarily the next greatest thing...just maybe the safest bet of this draft. We will not be able to fill some other holes if we try to move up to 1.

I am absolutely burnt out from the recycled QBs we’ve had the last three seasons. And I like a lot of what I see from CJ. If our staff is all in then I definitely am as well. The picks won’t hurt as bad if we have a couple solid seasons. Which I think we are more than capable of having with this staff and roster. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...