Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's Stroud and it shouldn't even be close


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

To give up that much capital to move to #1 and then release you would be willing to trade down tells me that you aren't taking someone who's gonna go 1 or 2 on most boards. 

 

I think it's AR. 

If the Panthers are serious about moving back it is for Richardson. I do not believe for a second it's a 1a/1b situation when they have an entire scouting department to make definitive rankings for draft day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I ever hear about is Young's lack of height.  There have been other diminutive quarterbacks in the NFL.  Maybe you remember them: Drew Brees, Russell Wilson, Michael Vick, Joe Theisman, and Fran Tarkenton to name a few.  Granted there has also been Tua, Baker Mayfield, Johnny Manziel, and Ty Detmer. I guess my point is this: lack of height shouldn't be the only consideration.  I'm concerned that that Stroud might be a system quarterback and we won't have the endless supply of receivers that the OSU turns out annually. I guess I am more impressed with Bryce's performance this past season with the Hodge-podge of receivers Alabama put out there  every Saturday. That's closer to what the Panthers have.  I think Bryce Young is a winner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, John Lee Pettimore said:

All I ever hear about is Young's lack of height.  There have been other diminutive quarterbacks in the NFL.  Maybe you remember them: Drew Brees, Russell Wilson, Michael Vick, Joe Theisman, and Fran Tarkenton to name a few.  Granted there has also been Tua, Baker Mayfield, Johnny Manziel, and Ty Detmer. I guess my point is this: lack of height shouldn't be the only consideration.  I'm concerned that that Stroud might be a system quarterback and we won't have the endless supply of receivers that the OSU turns out annually. I guess I am more impressed with Bryce's performance this past season with the Hodge-podge of receivers Alabama put out there  every Saturday. That's closer to what the Panthers have.  I think Bryce Young is a winner. 

He's shorter than all the guys you mentioned.

A small forward can play center but the other team with everyone playing their natural position (height/weight)will win for a reason.

It's just life buddy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Eric4280 said:

It’s been pointed out countless times on here and I’m sure I’ll get flack for it. Yes, fine, Young didn’t play elite nfl players every week. Stroud will not have Garret Wilson, Chris Olave, Marvin Harrison Jr, Jaxson Smith Njigba, and Emeka Egbuka level wr talent gap over primarily big10 level CB. Terrace Marshall, Laviska Shanault, Shi Smith and maybe Jakobi Meyers… Adam Theilen, Juju… and whatever leftover is at 39 (I hope Hyatt for the team build purposes). Yep. Young will ALWAYS be small and that’ll scare a lot. But there is a chance that Stroud ends up being just a solid mid tier qb, unless ya surround him with real talent. And that’ll be hard to do until like 2024 because THIS team needs a first round WR. Not a solid wr 2 , a real bonafide one. It also needs a real WEAPON out of the backfield . Not Chuba Hubbard. It also needs usage at Tight End, not Ian Thomas. 
 

Our build is exactly why I’m afraid of Stroud and get crap for it. If we had ATL weapons, fine yeah absolutely Stroud has 2 huge targets that are potentially elite. Come here and you’ll have to scrape the bottom of the barrel (and do not try to sell me on this FA class of wr please) at damn near all positions.

They aren't drafting for this one single year. You draft for a career.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, t96 said:

And he was a literal freak one of a kind hall of famer. Those specs alone now are a dime a dozen. The average size in the NFL in Flutie's time was considerably smaller compared to now. Using him as an example of a tiny QB holding up now isn't very convincing.

i didn’t know i was trying to convince you of something. if that’s the case, then look at the last sentence of what i wrote.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Young or Stroud and I am happy.  I think Young is a better player but it’s close enough to bring size into it.  Stroud’s accuracy is top shelf.

I cannot see this group of highly qualified people settling on Richardson.  Just can’t 

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Young or Stroud and I am happy.  I think Young is a better player but it’s close enough to bring size into it.  Stroud’s accuracy is top shelf.

I cannot see this group of highly qualified people settling on Richardson.  Just can’t 

No way it’s AR at 1. You need a high floor if you are risking that much. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

Then how about Greg Cosell??

Great listen. Cosell says the same stuff I’ve been saying for the past four or five months. CJ’s throwing ability is special, can do things not many young QBs can ever do with his throws. He’s plenty mobile for what the QB position requires and has shown it his whole career, not just the final game. Says he’s the top QB. Very complimentary of Young too, specifies it’s his size not his height that is concerning. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Great listen. Cosell says the same stuff I’ve been saying for the past four or five months. CJ’s throwing ability is special, can do things not many young QBs can ever do with his throws. He’s plenty mobile for what the QB position requires and has shown it his whole career, not just the final game. Says he’s the top QB. Very complimentary of Young too, specifies it’s his size not his height that is concerning. 

Ppl here want to find reasons to not like a player and will disregard opinions from professional analysts to do so.. So I just keep posting these opinions because at this point it’s crazy not to see how good a prospect Stroud is..

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...