Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign Vonn Bell


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I think the Chinn angle is undertalked about. I mean day one and they sign a safety?!?!? Chinn and his huge neck, better buckle up and get to making a difference.....this is his contract year too...

I don't know how much weight Chinn could pack on but both him and shaq are light for ILB. Panthers are going to need to address that with more than shy

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they have other plans for Chinn , well they are gonna have to trade some to get skill players.

I was wondering if there are an quality guys blocked by a great player, in any of these organizations they pulled these coaches in from. They got coaches from all over, should be a couple teams are high on but don't have a starting spot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Eric4280 said:

I have zero idea what the Bengals are doing. Losing Bates, I get it, that price tag is crazy. Bell in multiple ways was better and more important to that defense and they have cap! Mind boggling lmao.

Could be as simple as he wanted to go

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys Chinn is going where he belongs, on the ball as any non idiot coach already knows and as I got poo for saying when Rhule the idiot put him there

hes a playmaker

and he’s not a small dude like…at all, big frame, 10 LBs is all he needs 6’3 230 too small? Since when? I mean a little heavier is ideal but he is a playmaker…Beason and smitty were much further from ideal but you put the talent where it makes an impact, Chinn is that dude, just watch 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade Chinn? He's one of our best players. He is a chess piece.  

I keep seeing people trying to find a position for him to play in our base defense, which we won't even be in the majority of the time!

This team is continuing to build every phase of this team.  Offense, defense, special teams. 

Our defensive coordinator is going to love wrecking havoc to opposing offenses, forcing them to account for where Chinn is.  

The talent and flexibility this defense has is getting more and more impressive.  

It's great to have 2 good safeties, and I'm excited to see our defense to take another step or two towards being elite. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, onmyown said:

guys Chinn is going where he belongs, on the ball as any non idiot coach already knows and as I got poo for saying when Rhule the idiot put him there

hes a playmaker

and he’s not a small dude like…at all, big frame, 10 LBs is all he needs 6’3 230 too small? Since when? I mean a little heavier is ideal but he is a playmaker…Beason and smitty were much further from ideal but you put the talent where it makes an impact, Chinn is that dude, just watch 

You should have another go at that first paragraph if you want to try and make sense.

 

He isn't 230

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, csx said:

He isn't 230

Did you just skim over the whole 10 LBs is all he needs part literally right before I put 230 for some reason?

It is not that hard for 25 year old athlete with a 6’3 frame to put on 10lbs of mostly muscle. And you certainly don’t get rid of a playmaker due to 10lbs.

Edited by onmyown
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...