Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marc Ryan - "Carolina Zeroed in on Stroud and Richardson"

CPcavedweller

By CPcavedweller,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jaxel Veteran

Jaxel

Posted
Posted

I kind of look at this way. If I'm Fit and Reich am I risking my last chance as a coach and GM on the incredible rawness of Anthony Richardson? Maybe I'm adverse to extreme risk, but I am certainly not. I would go with the somewhat less risker option with a probable great return. Which in this case would be Young or Stroud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

I don’t want to have to do that for the 1st pick in the draft.. 
Come up with gadget plays just to get him playing time??? 
We gave up 3 picks and our number 1 Wr for that??

And you literally just described what San Fran did with Lance..

To be 1000% clear, he isn't my top choice for pick 1.  I prefer Stroud and Young over him.  I just think he is further along than people are thinking and will probably be playing some in year 1.  That Florida offense had him looking a lot worse than he is.  I saw a lot of drop backs, going through reads, and WRs dropping nice throws.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sub Zero Rising Star

Sub Zero

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Jaxel said:

I kind of look at this way. If I'm Fit and Reich am I risking my last chance as a coach and GM on the incredible rawness of Anthony Richardson? Maybe I'm adverse to extreme risk, but I am certainly not. I would go with the somewhat less risker option with a probable great return. Which in this case would be Young or Stroud.

Even if I’m tepper,. I took the big swing 7 years 70 million dollars thinking I’ve found the next Jimmie Johnson in college.. 

Why would he be talked into doing it again..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soul Rebel Experienced

Soul Rebel

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

I kind of look at this way. If I'm Fit and Reich am I risking my last chance as a coach and GM on the incredible rawness of Anthony Richardson? Maybe I'm adverse to extreme risk, but I am certainly not. I would go with the somewhat less risker option with a probable great return. Which in this case would be Young or Stroud.

It's like someone said earlier in the eval process.....

A coach can risk being fired over Anthony Richardson. If you select him and he busts, you're fired. If you don't select him and he becomes the next great QB, you better hope "your guy" is a franchise QB or else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jaxel Veteran

Jaxel

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Soul Rebel said:

It's like someone said earlier in the eval process.....

A coach can risk being fired over Anthony Richardson. If you select him and he busts, you're fired. If you don't select him and he becomes the next great QB, you better hope "your guy" is a franchise QB or else.

Well by that standard you have 2x the chance not selecting him than selecting him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sub Zero Rising Star

Sub Zero

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

To be 1000% clear, he isn't my top choice for pick 1.  I prefer Stroud and Young over him.  I just think he is further along than people are thinking and will probably be playing some in year 1.  That Florida offense had him looking a lot worse than he is.  I saw a lot of drop backs, going through reads, and WRs dropping nice throws.  

I get that .. I still disagree with the opinion on Richardson and just need you to explain to me why you have that Opinion..

let’s be real.. AR  has been in The Florida program since 2020 but couldn’t win the starting job until 2022 .. Emory nor Luke whatever we’re good QB’s but they held AR back for 2 years .. How??

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Huddler Veteran

The Huddler

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hoenheim said:

Would make absolutely 0 sense to trade up to 1 for Richardson, if you trade down to 3 or 4 for him then why trade up to 1 in the first place. Probably could've kept DJ and gave up a little less to get to 3 and get him. 

I think I've seen it reported that no team in the history of the NFL draft has ever traded up to #1 and then traded out of it. The Panthers would be stupid as hell to be the first team to do so 

who are you to say he will for sure be there at 3-4? 

 

just because dumb dumb TV internet guy has a list of best to worst doesnt mean its accurate worth a poo.  who knows whats going on in the war rooms of the teams in the top.  

 

Mike Mayock prime example. 

 

just sit back and let Fitt do his thing 

 

not saying we should take Richardson at one.  just calling out fans thinking they know how the board is gunna fall

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

Yes really it is .. Stop watching hype video where they only show you the good plays.. He missed more short easy throw then anybody I’ve ever seen .. If another team play a zone he was lost completely.. If they stopped the run the game was over and look like Darnold in NO last season.. 

I have no clue what you think you saw but this kid maybe just as raw or even less prepared to play then Malik last year and the “real” Tape says this..

I'm sorry, I can't take you seriously. I've watched every game I can find of each of the top four. Stroud, Levis, and Richardson I've often watched games 2-4 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Ornias said:

Teams have too much time now between combine and the draft. I am afraid we will talk ourselves out of the best choice. 

Yeah. Certainly looks like we moved up not being in love with anyone and would “figure it out”.  

which I don’t love. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sub Zero Rising Star

Sub Zero

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

I'm sorry, I can't take you seriously. I've watched every game I can find of each of the top four. Stroud, Levis, and Richardson I've often watched games 2-4 times.

Good still doesn’t change the fact this dude miss more easy passes on the level of Kyle Bowler and  Has less experienced then any QB predicted to be drafted in the 1st round.. 

He couldn’t read defense once they made adjustments..  He was lost when they spied him.. And without his running ability he would be similar to Clemson’s Ugala.. 
 

Dont take me seriously but show this great film where a QB with the lowest comp % Of any QB ever considered to be drafted this high and a 17  - 9 tds to interception line and just blame his footwork.. Even with good footwork he miss throws and went to the wrong read..

Facts are facts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...