Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Statistics: There is no correlation btwn QB height and batted passes


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

I’m not worried about batted balls as much as missing open reads through lack of vision, not making the pass because the lane isn’t there, not being able to play under center, and of course durability. I just keep thinking of how great Baker was in college vs NFL. His size seemed to limit him more than expected at the next level. 

Bu..bu..but Baker is Baker. He has a photograohic memory, a stronger arm than Young, good movement skills, etc.

I see Young as slightly better than Baker just because his release is quicker but all of his balls float. He can't Rope anything in beyond 10 yards past the LOS and making those cross field throws, on time, is going to be hard for him.

Stroud makes those outs and digs look easy from 40 yards out. His footwork is perfect. He makes the right reads pre-snap. We don't need the most vocal guy. We need a guy who can execute and Reich hasn't had someone who can place the ball like Stroud since Luck. Obviously Luck could run but that ended up being his downfall as well.

And for people who sag you need someone who can create. Tom Brady went to 10 Super Bowls. He may be the least athletic guy who ever played in the NFL. Stroud has the same kind of ball placement as Brady, Luck, Burrow, etc. If it's there mentally as well, you take him and don't look back, especially with Caldwell, MCcown, and Reich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah if I'm an NFL team I force Bryce to throw in the pocket giving him no open lanes. Stroud is much harder to game plan for because he will have an answer for every defensive scheme you present. 

That's the thing, what worked for Bryce in college, even in the SEC, may not translate. Russell Wilson was a great pocket passer at NC State and Wisconsin. He scrambled when he needed to but he wasn't out there running around in circles like Bryce tends to do.

Kyler Murray is a baseball player and his speed and throwing motion, along with initial velocity and spin rate, show that. 

Young is neither of those. I'd say his comp is closer to Doug Flutie but no one wants to admit it. He's a small, good college QB on the most talented roster in college football. Put Stroud down in Alabama with Bill O'Brian and I think Stroud still throws 40 touchdowns and for 4,000 yards. I think Levis would've even put up better numbers than Bryce at Alabama. Look at what he did in 2021 at freaking Kentucky.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont care about the batted balls, it happened to Baker so much because our offense was dog poo.

I just dont want a smaller version of Russell Wilson. He doesnt have a super bowl ring without one of the best D's of all time and the horseshoe tied to a rabbits foot stuck up his ass. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Risk/Reward

Choosing an NFL QB is similar to making any investment.

While there is an element of risk in most investments, taking unnecessary risks often leads to disaster.

CJ appears to have all the skills necessary to lead the Panthers to their ultimate goal and w/a lower level of risk.  

So, why would the Panthers take on more risk than necessary with a different QB selection?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

CJ appears to have all the skills necessary to lead the Panthers to their ultimate goal and w/a lower level of risk.  

I like CJ Stroud, but there is a risk factor in that he needs optimal conditions to succeed. His ability to play out of structure is subpar, with limited tape showing he can do so. His pressure QBR is about 70%, vs Bryce Young's appx 95%.

Young's ability to maneuver in the pocket and out of structure is uncanny and without doubt one of the best in the class.

But, then you have CJ's arm strength which is superior to Young's, so question if Young can make the zips in the short - intermediate range is valid. 

Nevertheless, both have talent and their demerits, but still both would be worthy of the #1 selection. I'm indifferent on the direction the Panthers take and trust their evaluation whether it be Stroud or Young.

Only way I'd be mad is if it were neither of those two...lol.

Edited by Saca312
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Rags said:

However, I 100% believe it does effect how well you see over the pocket. Which is my bigger concern. 

QBs have to work thru windows.  Many of the lineman are taller than the QB.  Tom Brady confirmed that even he has to work thru windows and not "over the line."

I find the chart interesting.  Each QB is unique in their skill set, delivery, decision making and the offenses that they run.  Some offenses simply lead to more batted balls than others.  However, I do see a little bit of something.  I have heard that there is generally a sweet spot when it comes to being a QB that is somewhere around 6'-2" and 6'-3".  Its just tall enough to buck the downsides of being short and just enough to buck the downside of being tall.  Its interesting to note that the super tall QBs on the far right have a higher than normal batted ball rate in 3 out of 4 cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

I like CJ Stroud, but there is a risk factor in that he needs optimal conditions to succeed. His ability to play out of structure is subpar

The film disagrees with this.  One thing that has come to light for me rewatching all of the games is that one of Stroud's strengths is to process information quickly and efficiently, which allows him to execute more plays "in structure" than Bryce Young would under the same circumstances.  And when the play reaches a point where its impossible to stay within structure, Stroud shows on film that he is fully capable of moving effectively AND making accurate passes on the move.

I thought Bryce Young's ability to play out of structure was a feature of his game.  The film says otherwise.  Playing out of structure IS his game.  He literally turns down open throws within structure to run around out of structure.  If you could create an alternate universe where you dropped CJ Stroud at QB and then Bryce Young at QB to run the exact same play against the exact same defense, the 2 guys would often make it look completely different.  CJ has the ability to make it look like the receiver was open and the pass blocking was on point.  So of course it was a completion, it was easy.  Byce can take that same play and make it look like none of his receivers are open and that the pass protection was bad, so he had to improvise and make a heroic play.  Or as I said in another thread...CJ has a knack for making things look easy while Bryce has a knack for making things look harder.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...