Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Todd McShay 2 round mock


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

No chance we take a Guard with our 2nd rounder, we'll take someone who could/should be at minimum a regular player in rotation if not an outright starter somewhere.

A guard, if all things go to plan this year, wouldn't see a single snap in their rookie year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Even in that article, McShay says it could be either Young or Stroud 🤔

He states that afterwards, but his source that is "never wrong" said Young is their guy.  HE thinks it is between Young and Stroud, but his source said it's Young and he claims that source is "never wrong."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Don't overthink this draft the best available WR or TE with pick #39.

 

Love Chark and Thilen but they are no game changers, both are solid at their job. We still need another WR in this rotation.

Downs at 39 is my preference 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

We signed McCray as well.  However BC and Mays could be excellent depth at multiple positions (including LT for BC) plus Icky and Torrence could be a great combo on the left side (assuming that is where he plays). 

Played RG his final 3 years. Interesting fact, 4 year starter that never gave up a sack in his entire career. I still think that G is a luxury pick at 39. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

He states that afterwards, but his source that is "never wrong" said Young is their guy.  HE thinks it is between Young and Stroud, but his source said it's Young and he claims that source is "never wrong."

He might end up being right, but the word from the Panthers about that decision not being made yet is very believable.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

He might end up being right, but the word from the Panthers about that decision not being made yet is very believable.

He might end up being right in the same way that you might end up being right if you call "heads" on a coin flip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Don't overthink this draft the best available WR or TE with pick #39.

 

Love Chark and Thilen but they are no game changers, both are solid at their job. We still need another WR in this rotation.

You take best player available that’s what the drafts for never draft for need 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rayzor said:

Torrence, huh? Interesting.....

 

possible.  Remember we just hired our first offensive minded coach, and he's already stated we have a good defense, and he wants a good offense.  He's gonna get a QB at one, and he may be thinking we need to protect him, and he's right.

If there are no WRs left, and with two of our IOL recovering from serious injures, he might choose to solidify the line. Worked for the Saints with Brees...you get your QB, you protect him.  Saints spent an incredible amount of draft capitol plus big contracts to protect their QB.

  I'd love a CB or edge, but understand if it's OL.  A prior poster suggested that a guard wouldn't play a snap his rookie year.  We started Icky last year as a rookie....he was a top 10 pick but he also played a much harder position at LT.  We wouldn't even play Gross at LT his rookie season, instead playing him at RT or guard, can't remember.

We'll all have to adjust our thinking to an offensive minded coach.  

48hours New Sheriff GIF - 48Hours New Sheriff Cowboy Hat ...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's a good feeney spin move that I never remember big money having. Plus I had forgotten that Charles is Panthers all-time sack leader. I havnt got a read on nic, he's awful young and talented. He talks about effort and wants to stop the run. I need to see him in live action, then maybe its nickname or former panther name time for me.
    • Not trying to be melodramatic but from a corporate standpoint there is a big push for data security and privacy pertaining to personal information.  Someone mentioned in the other thread about suing the kid but the only place there is possible money is him suing the Falcons organization for negligence related to the leaked personal information.   At best, Shedur makes some added bank and the Falcons look like fools while this circus plays out. At worst, he’ll get free credit monitoring for a year or two. 
    • I met Shaq at an OTA---if you recall, he was absent until the end due to Washington being on the quarter system. He was very nice--soft spoken--but I was thinking "Linebacker?" As an OLB in a 4-3, he was small.  I did not see 6'0"--I saw 5'10-5'11 tops and maybe 220.  When we converted to a 3-4, that moved him inside and, in my opinion, shortened his career.  He just does not have the frame for ILB duties.  If you watch enough film, you will see that Shaq often was late getting to the hole and tackled from the side a lot.  Morgan and Luke were in the hole square with the LOS and talking on blocks and RBs head on.  Had Shaq met pulling guards and fullbacks in the hole like that, he would not have lasted 4 years. He had a very frail frame. 
×
×
  • Create New...