Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More Smoke? Adam Schefter: CAR traded for Young, then checked other QBs. They did not bridge gap.


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

If you haven't accepted Bryce Young will be our QB by now then I feel sorry for you.

 

Im already making plans to get his #9 jersey.

 

Until then keep making those small jokes...

Jimmy Fallon Lol GIF by The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon

 

But in all seriousness, I too will purchase his jersey (Assuming they'll make it in adult sizes)

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

If you haven't accepted Bryce Young will be our QB by now then I feel sorry for you.

 

Im already making plans to get his #9 jersey.

 

Until then keep making those small jokes...

They’ll have him here in the introductory press conference and there will people still unable to come to grips it isn’t a smoke screen

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

We are FAR from the only organization/people that think Young is the best prospect in this class.  This isn't something outlandish or crazy, in fact in the general consensus throughout the NFL.  Young looks to be the number 1 QB prospect this year and this is coming from someone who has leaned Stroud.  

And how many times have these same people been wrong about the best QB in a draft? Many, that’s how many. I’m still not in the trust Reich club yet. He’s done nothing to deserve that trust yet.  

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Out of all the QB in this draft AR or Levis(you never know) could ball out and Young or Stroud could be a bust but is unlikely. Nobody will know anything until these prospects actually play to show their worth. Only good coaching can hopefully fix each QB's flaws.

How does coaching fix being 5'10" and 185lbs?

Brees had to crane his neck to see over the OLine and he admitted he was still throwing blind to the middle of the field. He was 2 inches taller than Young (and no less athletic). 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ncfan said:

They’ll have him here in the introductory press conference and there will people still unable to come to grips it isn’t a smoke screen

I think it will be a minority, I think even if its young there will be a overwhelming sense of excitement that we finally have someone to build around

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

How does coaching fix being 5'10" and 185lbs?

Brees had to crane his neck to see over the OLine and he admitted he was still throwing blind to the middle of the field. He was 2 inches taller than Young (and no less athletic). 

Yeah coaching can't fix height issues but can fix gameplay issues. 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

I mean if it's true Cam couldn't get calls due to his size, then Bryce should get the Michael Jordan treatment

I’ve been wishing for years we could simply get a laughing reaction, this was funny lol

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

How does coaching fix being 5'10" and 185lbs?

Brees had to crane his neck to see over the OLine and he admitted he was still throwing blind to the middle of the field. He was 2 inches taller than Young (and no less athletic). 

Yeah, Young and Brees might’ve been the same height if Brees didn’t have a neck like Mike Glennon

 

 

IMG_7029.jpeg

Edited by CLG
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...