Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Bryce a #1 prospect if he didn’t go to Bama?


Wundrbread33
 Share

Is Bryce Young a #1 prospect if he didn’t go to Bama?  

80 members have voted

  1. 1. Well?

    • Yay
      61
    • Nay
      19


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:


show me which stats are significantly better

 

And it does matter Stroud was throwing to a generational WR in Marvin Harrison Jr. and the top WR in this draft’s class as well. Meanwhile Young was throwing to the equivalent of Philly Brown and Brenton Bersin last year, so take the raw stats with bag of salt.

 

 

2022 Stats:

  • Bryce Young - 3,328 yards, 32 TDs, 5 INTs
  • CJ Stroud - 3,688 yards, 41 TDs, 6 INTs (and a higher completion %, if you're into that kind of thing)

 

With regards to the supporting class:

  • WR: Jermaine Burton - 4*, 99th overall recruit in Class of 2020
  • WR: Jacorey Brooks - 4*, 52nd overall recruit in Class of 2021
  • WR: Kobe Prentice - 4*, 85th overall recruit in Class of 2022
  • WR: Traeshon Holden - 4*, 263rd overall recruit in Class of 2020
  • RB: Jahmyr Gibbs - 4*, 178th overall recruit in Class of 2020
  • RB: Jase McClellan - 4*, 41st overall recruit in Class of 2020

 

Don't tell me he's playing with absolute bums. That roster is fuging stacked.

 

Edited by OldhamA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

Yes. His 2022 Bama team was defined by poor oline pass blocking, poor rb blitz pickups, and mediocre receivers.  This would be a better question if he came out in '21 with a much better oline and wr's. Essentially '21 Bama = '22 Ohio State so the better question is whether CJ would be a no. 1 prospect if he had not attended OSU. Both inquiries are off though as they both distanced themselves from the rest of the field. 

It's a question they both have to answer - how good are they when the playing field is more even. 9.5 times out of 10 they had the better players when they stepped on the field. Did they elevate the play of those around them, or were they carried?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wundrbread33 said:

That’s fair, but some prospects get elevated for that, and some get punished. 
 

Sam Howell is the counter example. Highly touted two years ago. His weapons all got drafted. He still performed rather well, had to run more, just not as good (understandable), and then he falls from grace. 
 

It’s inconsistent (not saying you are, just the “draft narrative” stuff as a whole).

idk man I watched every Sam game. He did not progress well in his last season. Our o line did him no favors but he made some terrible decisions. I was surprised he fell to the fifth but watching him he had no business being talked about in the first round. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryce:

  • 5-Star HS QB
  • #1 Dual Threat HS QB   
  • #1 Overall HS QB
  • 2021 Heismann winner
  • 2022 Heismann runner-up
  • #1 overall QB in college two straight years

 

Stroud:

  • 4-Star HS QB
  • #2 Pro-Style HS QB
  • #3 Overall HS QB
  • 2021 Heismann runner-up
  • 2022 Heismann runner up
  • #2 QB in college two straight years

I'd say Bryce would do this at most programs that he was heavily recruited by within reason of calibre of program. Would he do it at Vanderbilt, Duke, Colorado State? Probably not as well...but the heavy hitters that #1 QBs go to, I'd say yes.

Young has always been the #1 prospect and it's hard to argue otherwise.

For me, not every collegiate QB translates over and succeeds in the NFL. Usually it's for the reasons that are not related to BY..... IQ, headspace under pressure, processing, speed of the game, etc. 

For every successful QB, there's lots of Leafs, Tebows, Gabberts, Darnolds, Sanchezs and Weurfels. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

Bryce:

  • 5-Star HS QB
  • #1 Dual Threat HS QB   
  • #1 Overall HS QB
  • 2021 Heismann winner
  • 2022 Heismann runner-up
  • #1 overall QB in college two straight years

 

Stroud:

  • 4-Star HS QB
  • #2 Pro-Style HS QB
  • #3 Overall HS QB
  • 2021 Heismann runner-up
  • 2022 Heismann runner up
  • #2 QB in college two straight years

I'd say Bryce would do this at most programs that he was heavily recruited by within reason of calibre of program. Would he do it at Vanderbilt, Duke, Colorado State? Probably not as well...but the heavy hitters that #1 QBs go to, I'd say yes.

Young has always been the #1 prospect and it's hard to argue otherwise.

For me, not every collegiate QB translates over and succeeds in the NFL. Usually it's for the reasons that are not related to BY..... IQ, headspace under pressure, processing, speed of the game, etc. 

For every successful QB, there's lots of Leafs, Tebows, Gabberts, Darnolds, Sanchezs and Weurfels. 

 

His feel for the game and intangibles are easy to get excited over. 
 

I’m more comfortable with Stroud at this point because he seems like a bright kid too, and there aren’t physical question marks with him (and his ball placement is so good) but if Young is the pick I think people have to work hard to not be excited over him too. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

His feel for the game and intangibles are easy to get excited over. 
 

I’m more comfortable with Stroud at this point because he seems like a bright kid too, and there aren’t physical question marks with him (and his ball placement is so good) but if Young is the pick I think people have to work hard to not be excited over him too. 

This is where I'm at with the whole situation. 

I prefer Stroud but man....BY, IMO, has more superstar potential. It's a matter of whether he can play 17+ games a year, and do it in December/January in cold weather, harsh environments. 

Young could be a superstar though. He's an outlier, but at some point, someone of his stature will break the mold. It would be horrible in retrospect to have missed out on it....serious FOMO.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Soul Rebel said:

This is where I'm at with the whole situation. 

I prefer Stroud but man....BY, IMO, has more superstar potential. It's a matter of whether he can play 17+ games a year, and do it in December/January in cold weather, harsh environments. 

Young could be a superstar though. He's an outlier, but at some point, someone of his stature will break the mold. It would be horrible in retrospect to have missed out on it....serious FOMO.

You know what? fug it you flipped me. Bryce Young 2023 let’s fuging go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Would anyone else have been a #1 pick if they had gone to Alabama this year?

I'll play. Yes. Saben would tailor the offense to maximize their strengths. Given the talent of the 4 I could see any of them in the conversation as the 1st overall had they gone to Bama. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'll play. Yes. Saben would tailor the offense to maximize their strengths. Given the talent of the 4 I could see any of them in the conversation as the 1st overall had they gone to Bama. 

How often does the #1 pick come from bama?

Was it right guy in the right situation, right guy who could have been at any situation, or right situation that would have benefitted anyone?

Also, would Young have done as good or better than Stroud at OSU?

And would Stroud have done as well or better than Young at Bama?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

How often does the #1 pick come from bama?

Was it right guy in the right situation, right guy who could have been at any situation, or right situation that would have benefitted anyone?

Also, would Young have done as good or better than Stroud at OSU?

And would Stroud have done as well or better than Young at Bama?

Alabama probably had less talent on offense this year but a better coach so it probably ends up very similar if you switch the QBs IMO.  Young would thrive with all of those weapons and Saban/O'Brien would have Stroud looking as good as Day did with less around him (last year only). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Beck is likely to be a Day 2 or 3 guy.
    • Schlereth calling us back to back....somebody call up Morgan!  Schlereth got that dawg in him!
    • I was just thinking — if Bryce had been the #1 overall pick without the massive trade-up, there wouldn’t be nearly this much anger and resentment toward him. The problem isn’t Bryce himself; it’s what Scott Fitterer gave up to get him and how the front office completely mismanaged the assets that followed. The picks from the Christian McCaffrey trade — one of our few major opportunities to rebuild with young talent — were essentially wasted. The second-rounder was used on Jonathan Mingo,  The third and fourth-round picks were packaged to move up for DJ Johnson, a 25-year-old rookie  who looked like a miss from day 1.  That’s brutal roster management. And when you add in other misses like Trevon Wallace and Xavier Legette—guys who were supposed to be athletic difference-makers but haven’t moved the needle—it just compounds the issue. Combine that with a string of awful free-agent signings (Hurst, Chark, Bozeman regressing, etc.), and it’s no wonder the offense looks like a mess. And this goes beyond Fitterer — it’s a scouting department problem too. For years, the Panthers’ evaluations have been inconsistent and reactive. They’ve chased traits and combine numbers over production and football IQ. The same front office that identified DJ Johnson as a third-round target somehow passed on multiple plug-and-play starters at positions of need. When your scouting process keeps missing on mid-round talent — the backbone of good teams — no quarterback can save you. The lack of depth and development across this roster is the real indictment. None of these failures are Bryce’s fault directly. But when the entire team looks lifeless, the narrative circles back to him. He was supposed to be the “force multiplier,” the “point guard” who elevates everyone else. Problem is, there’s not much “force” around him to multiply, and that style of quarterback play only works when the infrastructure is solid — coaching, protection, and playmakers. Look at the 49ers for comparison. If San Francisco didn’t have elite coaching, culture, and roster talent, that Trey Lance trade would be seen as one of the biggest front-office blunders ever. The difference is they had the organization to survive it. At least Bryce is serviceable — Lance isn’t even on their roster anymore. Put Bryce in the 49ers’ system and he’s probably putting up Brock Purdy-like numbers. The bottom line is this: the dysfunction in Carolina didn’t start with Bryce Young, and it sure hasn’t ended with him. This is a franchise problem — years of poor drafting, weak scouting, short-sighted trades, and constant turnover. The common denominator through all of it? David Tepper. Until the culture, patience, and football operations at the top change, it won’t matter who the quarterback is.  
×
×
  • Create New...