Did the S2 TEST take CJ out?

[XClown1986]

24 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

*you're

I'm 'whining' on a message board because a) I'm British, so good luck getting a foot in the door of an NFL franchise and b) I have a very lucrative career of my own.

There's a reason these guys are fired every other year too - besides someone like Ozzie Newsome, they're all flawed. I mean at one point Thomas Dimitroff was considered hot poo (NFL Exec of the year) and now he has a podcast in his mid-50s.

NVM. I reread the post.

But still, neither a or b make it more understandable that you want to piss and moan that the Panthers don't agree with you.

Edited April 13, 2023 by XClown1986

[OldhamA]

7 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

And Bryce young is better on the field that’s why his haters can only bring up his size and not his play 

I agree, his size is his only true knock - but it's a hell of a knock. 

It's like drafting a CB that runs a 5 second 40 yard dash. His speed is always going to be a problem, regardless of how great his bump-and-run technique or zone coverage is.

[OldhamA]

1 minute ago, XClown1986 said:

Lol. His form of 'your' was actually correct Mr. Know-it-all. Cheerio

That sentence doesn't make sense unless he's saying "You are whining on a message board". 

[XClown1986]

If this test seems to be a real indicator of success vs failure, why would that be a bad thing exactly? I don't understand the pushback when the evidence clearly shows a correlation.

[mrcompletely11]

41 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Kunkel noted NO player in the last 7 years that’s had a bad score has panned out.

A) How would he know that?

B) whats a "bad" score?

C) what is his definition of working out?

See how easy this is?

[ncfan]

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

A) How would he know that?

B) whats a "bad" score?

C) what is his definition of working out?

See how easy this is?

How would he know that?  Um it’s not hard.  They have the S2 data.

no clue what they determine is a “bad score”

I’d think working out= being a franchise level QB.  Don’t think working out means your not a franchise level QB

[Varking]

25 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Purdy had some bad games too. He was projected to go higher and kind of regressed his junior year I believe. I guess my question is if the S2 is the greatest test why wasn’t Iowa St winning more with him at QB? Why are people saying Fields struggles to read defense as he apparently aced it as well? It’s just another source of data to look at like the wonderlic test.

Because Fields has silly haters who don’t like context and can’t imagine what it’s like when EQS and Byron Pringle are playing as your #1 and #2 WR and your offensive line has one NFL worthy player on it.

[Aussie Tank]

23 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I agree, his size is his only true knock - but it's a hell of a knock. 

It's like drafting a CB that runs a 5 second 40 yard dash. His speed is always going to be a problem, regardless of how great his bump-and-run technique or zone coverage is.

He’s been small his whole life and always overcome to be the best player on the field so I can’t see why that can’t continue in the NFL 

[Krovvy]

I don't think he scored "low", but if we're looking at pure processing, I would say he's the third quarterback this year. From watching all of their games, I came away with the following impression when it comes to processing.

• Bryce Young
• Anthony Richardson
• C.J. Stroud

 

• Will Levis

Just purely from what I saw in games.

[Mr. Scot]

 

[ncfan]

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

Saying this takes him out of the running of being the 2nd or 3rd QB off the board is wild

[Jackie Lee]

No how good would Levis do on this test if they put a glass of milk on the table? If Bryce could only see the top half of the screen? Do they have 300 pounds guys trying to tackle you while you take it? Does the computer get tired 3/4ths of the way through the test and slow down?

[Actionman0z]

What did Stroud score on the test? 

[Basbear]

tepper in deep love with this test, Id bet green USA money.....