Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer: Bryce Young scored 98 on his S2 teat


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Varking said:

I’m sure you can understand that if you were practicing taking the SATs or ACTs or any random test since 9th grade… studying and then taking it every year all the way to your junior year of college you might have an advantage over those seeing it for the very first time?

So what? I would be good at take SATs.  Ok.  This is a negative somehow?  This is totally irrelevant IMO.  Just say you like CJ more no need to try to discredit Young being good at these tests 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Why should this bother anyone?  He is very good at it since high school.  This doesn't discount anything.  

Yeah I dont get it.  I doubt the questions are the same each time.  Its like someone taking the SAT 4 times to get a 1580.  Still a helluva score any way you slice it.  And good on him for actually preparing for what he knew would be an important part of his overall evaluation. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

While that score is very impressive, hasn't he taken it a ton of times before (If I remember hearing that correctly)? If that is the case, I think that would help lead to getting a higher score since you know what to expect, as opposed to taking it for the first time.

Im not sure thats exactly how it works. There are definitely limitations to how fast someone can process things regardless of doing the test multiple times.  Im fairly sure its randomized and the examples ive heard were things like 5 shapes flash up and one is different in some way and how many tenths of a second it takes you to recognize the different one.   Its almost a measure of impulse.  I know it takes a specific computer setup and network to make sure there is 0 latency to measure the tenths of a seconds or even less accurately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

Yeah I dont get it.  I doubt the questions are the same each time.  Its like someone taking the SAT 4 times to get a 1580.  Still a helluva score any way you slice it.  And good on him for actually preparing for what he knew would be an important part of his overall evaluation. 

The test doesn't have questions as far as I understand it. I'd call them 'exercises.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Why should this bother anyone?  He is very good at it since high school.  This doesn't discount anything.  

The people who want to discount him will use it to discount him.  Discount any positive and constantly talk about his size.  Anything positive is a smokescreen and if hes the pick its because Tepper made the pick.   Same ol song and dance, I don't think im forgetting anything.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NAS said:

Exactly people comparing this to SAT is just dumb. It’s not an Intelligence test, it purely measures processing speed of your brain which you can’t learn or get better at, maybe marginally.

My long term loss of short term memory would equal an easy flunking of this test.  No matter how many times I took it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Why not say, "Of course his 40 time is good--he has been running it since high school!"

 

This is a good example but a bad example at the same time. If you run the 40 yard dash daily, you will get faster at it to a point. Better technique will get you faster. Better body conditioning will get you faster. There are things you can do to improve at it. I'm not sure how one would improve at the S2 specifically. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is probably a good point that I did not consider. It doesn’t force their hand financially, to declare early. 
    • Realistically he's probably not still going to be under contract when hes good to go again? Unfortunately for him you cant sign him for more than a small one year deal until he can prove hes still a good player... that might not happen.  I think hes played his last down as a panther.
    • It has been going down that backyard ball road with the QBs a long time. It also has made it more difficult to evaluate OL for the pro game.    I agree though that the NIL is making it even worse. Then they get in the league and suck, coaches get fired. Here comes a new system every year for some of them, same as you are talking about in college.    Unfortunately, IMO, the league has responded by taking the path of least resistance offensively.    The only saving grace for the QB problem we identified here is the slotted salaries out of the draft. No more 100 million rookie deals. Which today would be 250 million and even more.  So to me, paying a player that doesn’t bring success in the first two or three years, you can’t do it. Better to take another shot in the draft or reclaim someone else's failure. Given that all staffs are not equal. Look what Shanahan did with Purdy for instance. And their getting off of Lance quickly.    In theory if Canales is a QB whisperer type, which we don’t know he isn’t at least to a higher degree than many (not including the established masters) we should be quicker on the trigger with these QBs. If Bryce doesn’t show out next year we really need to hit the reset. 
×
×
  • Create New...